GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Page 3 of 7
Page 3 of 7 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:18 am
1993
The FDA approved aspartame as an ingredient in numerous food items that would always be heated to above 86�degrees F (30�Degrees C). An act that can only be described as “unconscionable”
1994
One has only to learn what really happened to the Christians in Rwanda between April and July of 1994 to imagine what may lie in store for Christians here in America at some time in the not-too-distant future. After the Christian Tutsis had been disarmed by governmental decree in the early 1990s, Hutu-led military forces began to systematically massacre the defenseless Christians. The massacre began in April 1994 and continued until July 1994. Using machetes rather than bullets, the Hutu forces were able to create a state of abject fear and terror within the helpless Christian population as they systematically butchered hundreds of thousands of them.
The United Nations immediately convened hearings on the genocide taking place in Rwanda, but Madeline Albright, the American Ambassador to the United Nations, argued strenuously that neighboring African nations should not be allowed to intervene until the “civil war had come to an end.” In reality, of course, there was no civil war since those being slaughtered had no weapons with which to defend themselves; it was simply a matter of mass murder. In addition to blocking intervention by neighboring nations, Madeline Albright also insisted that the word “genocide” must not be used, and that the United Nations forces stationed in Rwanda were not to be allowed to intervene. In the three months that followed, between one-half and three-quarters of a million Christians were systematically dismembered, hacked to death, and slaughtered in the bloody carnage that ensued.
Tens of thousands of Christians were murdered in their churches; tens of thousands more were murdered in their hospitals and in their schools. On several occasions, United Nations soldiers stationed in Rwanda actually handed over helpless Christians under their protection to members of the Hutu militia. They then stood by as their screaming charges were unceremoniously hacked to pieces. At the end of the carnage, in late July 1994, the American government rewarded the Hutu murderers with millions of dollars in foreign aid.
Strangely, the American press has remained silent Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA about the fact that almost all of those who were slaughtered were Christians, and it was the policies of our government that were primarily responsible for blocking efforts by neighboring African countries to intervene. The Population Control Agenda
1994
With a technique called “gene tracking,” Dr. Garth Nicolson at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX discovers that many returning Desert Storm veterans are infected with an altered strain of Mycoplasma incognitus, a microbe commonly used in the production of biological weapons. Incorporated into its molecular structure is 40 percent of the HIV protein coat, indicating that it had been man-made. See also The Resnick Interview with Peter Kawaja and Ex-NSA Agent Joe Jordan
1995
Dr Phyllis Mullenix, former head of toxicology at Forsyth Dental Center in Boston and now a critic of fluoridation. Animal studies which Mullenix and co-workers conducted at Forsyth in the early 1990s indicated that fluoride was a powerful central nervous system (CNS) toxin and might adversely affect human brain functioning even at low doses. (New epidemiological evidence from China adds support, showing a correlation between low-dose fluoride exposure and diminished IQ in children.) Mullenix’s results were published in 1995 in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific journal.
The FDA approved aspartame as an ingredient in numerous food items that would always be heated to above 86�degrees F (30�Degrees C). An act that can only be described as “unconscionable”
1994
One has only to learn what really happened to the Christians in Rwanda between April and July of 1994 to imagine what may lie in store for Christians here in America at some time in the not-too-distant future. After the Christian Tutsis had been disarmed by governmental decree in the early 1990s, Hutu-led military forces began to systematically massacre the defenseless Christians. The massacre began in April 1994 and continued until July 1994. Using machetes rather than bullets, the Hutu forces were able to create a state of abject fear and terror within the helpless Christian population as they systematically butchered hundreds of thousands of them.
The United Nations immediately convened hearings on the genocide taking place in Rwanda, but Madeline Albright, the American Ambassador to the United Nations, argued strenuously that neighboring African nations should not be allowed to intervene until the “civil war had come to an end.” In reality, of course, there was no civil war since those being slaughtered had no weapons with which to defend themselves; it was simply a matter of mass murder. In addition to blocking intervention by neighboring nations, Madeline Albright also insisted that the word “genocide” must not be used, and that the United Nations forces stationed in Rwanda were not to be allowed to intervene. In the three months that followed, between one-half and three-quarters of a million Christians were systematically dismembered, hacked to death, and slaughtered in the bloody carnage that ensued.
Tens of thousands of Christians were murdered in their churches; tens of thousands more were murdered in their hospitals and in their schools. On several occasions, United Nations soldiers stationed in Rwanda actually handed over helpless Christians under their protection to members of the Hutu militia. They then stood by as their screaming charges were unceremoniously hacked to pieces. At the end of the carnage, in late July 1994, the American government rewarded the Hutu murderers with millions of dollars in foreign aid.
Strangely, the American press has remained silent Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA about the fact that almost all of those who were slaughtered were Christians, and it was the policies of our government that were primarily responsible for blocking efforts by neighboring African countries to intervene. The Population Control Agenda
1994
With a technique called “gene tracking,” Dr. Garth Nicolson at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, TX discovers that many returning Desert Storm veterans are infected with an altered strain of Mycoplasma incognitus, a microbe commonly used in the production of biological weapons. Incorporated into its molecular structure is 40 percent of the HIV protein coat, indicating that it had been man-made. See also The Resnick Interview with Peter Kawaja and Ex-NSA Agent Joe Jordan
1995
Dr Phyllis Mullenix, former head of toxicology at Forsyth Dental Center in Boston and now a critic of fluoridation. Animal studies which Mullenix and co-workers conducted at Forsyth in the early 1990s indicated that fluoride was a powerful central nervous system (CNS) toxin and might adversely affect human brain functioning even at low doses. (New epidemiological evidence from China adds support, showing a correlation between low-dose fluoride exposure and diminished IQ in children.) Mullenix’s results were published in 1995 in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific journal.
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:18 am
1995
The University of Rochester’s classified fluoride studies, code-named “Program F“, were started during the war and continued up until the early 1950s. They were conducted at its Atomic Energy Project (AEP), a top-secret facility funded by the AEC and housed at Strong Memorial Hospital. It was there that one of the most notorious human radiation experiments of the Cold War took place, in which unsuspecting hospital patients were injected with toxic doses of radioactive plutonium. Revelation of this experiment - in a Pulitzer Prize winning account by Eileen Welsome - led to a 1995 US presidential investigation and a multimillion-dollar cash settlement for victims.
1995
U.S. Government admits that it had offered Japanese war criminals and scientists who had performed human medical experiments salaries and immunity from prosecution in exchange for data on biological warfare research.
1995
Dr. Garth Nicolson, uncovers evidence that the biological agents used during the Gulf War had been manufactured in Houston, TX and Boca Raton, Fl and tested on prisoners in the Texas Department of Corrections.
1996, 27 June
without public notice, the FDA removed all restrictions from aspartame allowing it to be used in everything, including all heated and baked goods. The truth about aspartame’s toxicity is far different than what the NutraSweet Company would have you readers believe.
1996
A new scientific paper dealing with a meta-analysis of 23 different scientific studies on the relationship between first-trimester abortions and breast cancer was published in a British medical journal. That study clearly demonstrated a higher incidence of breast cancer in women who had had first-trimester abortions. In response to that publication, the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Cancer Society (ACS), and pro-abortion/population-control advocates joined together in an unholy alliance to attack the conclusions of the authors, and to block all efforts to disseminate that information to American physicians. The Population Control Agenda
1997 October
Speaking from Washington, DC, Nobel Prize winner for discovering the role of molecules known as “prions” in the invariably fatal brain illnesses such as “mad cow disease” or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in humans, Dr Stanley Prusiner from the University of California predicted that the first drug therapy, which would not necessarily be a cure for BSE or CJD, was at least five years away.
At the same time, on the opposite side of the Atlantic, the post-mortem of Chris Warne, a 36-year-old fitness fanatic from Derbyshire, England, revealed that he was the 21st victim of the new variant of CJD which had spread from BSE-infected cattle to humans via the food chain. Only 18 months earlier, a British House of Commons admission that BSE-infected meat had probably caused the CJD deaths of 10 youthful Britons left the British meat industry in tatters.
Since then, the history of BSE has gradually unfolded to reveal a brain-dead imperialism, one which, while blinded by its own arrogant greed to inflate market profits, has treated public and, indeed, world health with gay abandon. Formerly a rare disease which affected less than one per million in most countries, one worst-case scenario predicts that BSE-infected meat will push the incidence of CJD in humans to claim 10,000 British lives by the year 2000, and a further 10 million by the year 2010.
Another predicts that half the British people, some 30 million, will be left brain-dead by CJD. As Chris Warne’s mother commented, her son was a health-conscious sportsman, but “after winning medals in March, by July he couldn’t stand on his feet, and by October he was gone”.
Researchers at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (or USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick in Frederick MD have reconstructed and modified the H1N1 Spanish Flu virus, making it far more deadly than it ever was back when it was responsible for the 1918-1919 flu pandemic that killed over 20 million worldwide and over 500,000 here in the US.
FRANCE is facing a new health scandal following allegations that the prestigious Pasteur Institute willfully ignored warnings that up to 600 children were being injected with cancerous hormones.
The disclosures that children may have been put at risk emerged during a new investigation into the link between the growth hormones and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), which caused a major scandal when acknowledged in the Nineties . So far, 74 children have died of CJD after being treated with growth hormones extracted from the bodies of victims of neurological illnesses in the Eighties.
That scandal and the contaminated blood affair in which 4,000 people were infected with HIV through unscreened blood transfusions - despite the availability of an American test for the virus - have contributed to France’s acute sensitivity on health issues. When the contaminated blood affair came to trial in 1998 , it was alleged that authorization for the American test was withheld to give the institute time to develop a rival French test.
The latest claims suggest that in 1985 the institute sold a batch of growth hormone to French hospitals without waiting for safety checks which showed the batch to have cancer marker cells at five times the permitted limit for use. The institute is further alleged to have made no efforts to withdraw the batch once it was aware of the risk.
The University of Rochester’s classified fluoride studies, code-named “Program F“, were started during the war and continued up until the early 1950s. They were conducted at its Atomic Energy Project (AEP), a top-secret facility funded by the AEC and housed at Strong Memorial Hospital. It was there that one of the most notorious human radiation experiments of the Cold War took place, in which unsuspecting hospital patients were injected with toxic doses of radioactive plutonium. Revelation of this experiment - in a Pulitzer Prize winning account by Eileen Welsome - led to a 1995 US presidential investigation and a multimillion-dollar cash settlement for victims.
1995
U.S. Government admits that it had offered Japanese war criminals and scientists who had performed human medical experiments salaries and immunity from prosecution in exchange for data on biological warfare research.
1995
Dr. Garth Nicolson, uncovers evidence that the biological agents used during the Gulf War had been manufactured in Houston, TX and Boca Raton, Fl and tested on prisoners in the Texas Department of Corrections.
1996, 27 June
without public notice, the FDA removed all restrictions from aspartame allowing it to be used in everything, including all heated and baked goods. The truth about aspartame’s toxicity is far different than what the NutraSweet Company would have you readers believe.
1996
A new scientific paper dealing with a meta-analysis of 23 different scientific studies on the relationship between first-trimester abortions and breast cancer was published in a British medical journal. That study clearly demonstrated a higher incidence of breast cancer in women who had had first-trimester abortions. In response to that publication, the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Cancer Society (ACS), and pro-abortion/population-control advocates joined together in an unholy alliance to attack the conclusions of the authors, and to block all efforts to disseminate that information to American physicians. The Population Control Agenda
1997 October
Speaking from Washington, DC, Nobel Prize winner for discovering the role of molecules known as “prions” in the invariably fatal brain illnesses such as “mad cow disease” or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in cattle, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in humans, Dr Stanley Prusiner from the University of California predicted that the first drug therapy, which would not necessarily be a cure for BSE or CJD, was at least five years away.
At the same time, on the opposite side of the Atlantic, the post-mortem of Chris Warne, a 36-year-old fitness fanatic from Derbyshire, England, revealed that he was the 21st victim of the new variant of CJD which had spread from BSE-infected cattle to humans via the food chain. Only 18 months earlier, a British House of Commons admission that BSE-infected meat had probably caused the CJD deaths of 10 youthful Britons left the British meat industry in tatters.
Since then, the history of BSE has gradually unfolded to reveal a brain-dead imperialism, one which, while blinded by its own arrogant greed to inflate market profits, has treated public and, indeed, world health with gay abandon. Formerly a rare disease which affected less than one per million in most countries, one worst-case scenario predicts that BSE-infected meat will push the incidence of CJD in humans to claim 10,000 British lives by the year 2000, and a further 10 million by the year 2010.
Another predicts that half the British people, some 30 million, will be left brain-dead by CJD. As Chris Warne’s mother commented, her son was a health-conscious sportsman, but “after winning medals in March, by July he couldn’t stand on his feet, and by October he was gone”.
Researchers at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (or USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick in Frederick MD have reconstructed and modified the H1N1 Spanish Flu virus, making it far more deadly than it ever was back when it was responsible for the 1918-1919 flu pandemic that killed over 20 million worldwide and over 500,000 here in the US.
FRANCE is facing a new health scandal following allegations that the prestigious Pasteur Institute willfully ignored warnings that up to 600 children were being injected with cancerous hormones.
The disclosures that children may have been put at risk emerged during a new investigation into the link between the growth hormones and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), which caused a major scandal when acknowledged in the Nineties . So far, 74 children have died of CJD after being treated with growth hormones extracted from the bodies of victims of neurological illnesses in the Eighties.
That scandal and the contaminated blood affair in which 4,000 people were infected with HIV through unscreened blood transfusions - despite the availability of an American test for the virus - have contributed to France’s acute sensitivity on health issues. When the contaminated blood affair came to trial in 1998 , it was alleged that authorization for the American test was withheld to give the institute time to develop a rival French test.
The latest claims suggest that in 1985 the institute sold a batch of growth hormone to French hospitals without waiting for safety checks which showed the batch to have cancer marker cells at five times the permitted limit for use. The institute is further alleged to have made no efforts to withdraw the batch once it was aware of the risk.
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:19 am
GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
[ADMIN: Codex Alimentarius is an attempt to overturn existing US laws in favor of pharma-friendly international trade rules. Codex is a threat to human health, human rights, democracy and nation.]
[color=yellow]Codex Alimentarius
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Codex Alimentarius (Latin for "food code" or "food book") is a collection of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice, guidelines and other recommendations relating to foods, food production and food safety. Its name derives from the Codex Alimentarius Austriacus.[1] Its texts are developed and maintained by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body that was established in 1963 by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). The Commission's main aims are stated as being to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair practices in the international food trade. The Codex Alimentarius is recognized by the World Trade Organization as an international reference point for the resolution of disputes concerning food safety and consumer protection.[2][3]
SCOPE:
The Codex Alimentarius officially covers all foods, whether processed, semi-processed or raw, but far more attention has been given to foods that are marketed directly to consumers. In addition to standards for specific foods, the Codex Alimentarius contains general standards covering matters such as food labeling, food hygiene, food additives and pesticide residues, and procedures for assessing the safety of foods derived from modern biotechnology. It also contains guidelines for the management of official (i.e., governmental) import and export inspection and certification systems for foods.
The Codex Alimentarius is published in Arabic, Chinese, English, French and Spanish. Not all texts are available in all languages.
[edit] General texts
Food labelling (general standard, guidelines on nutrition labelling, guidelines on labelling claims)
Food additives (general standard including authorized uses, specifications for food grade chemicals)
Contaminants in foods (general standard, tolerances for specific contaminants including radionuclides, aflatoxins and other mycotoxins)
Pesticide and veterinary chemical residues in foods (maximum residue limits)
Risk assessment procedures for determining the safety of foods derived from biotechnology (DNA-modified plants, DNA-modified micro-organisms, allergens)
Food hygiene (general principles, codes of hygienic practice in specific industries or food handling establishments, guidelines for the use of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point or “HACCP” system)
Methods of analysis and sampling
[edit] Specific standards
Meat products (fresh, frozen, processed meats and poultry)
Fish and fishery products (marine, fresh water and aquaculture)
Milk and milk products
Foods for special dietary uses (including infant formulae and baby foods)
Fresh and processed vegetables, fruits, and fruit juices
Cereals and derived products, dried legumes
Fats, oils and derived products such as margarine
Miscellaneous food products (chocolate, sugar, honey, mineral water)
[ADMIN: Codex Alimentarius is an attempt to overturn existing US laws in favor of pharma-friendly international trade rules. Codex is a threat to human health, human rights, democracy and nation.]
[color=yellow]Codex Alimentarius
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Codex Alimentarius (Latin for "food code" or "food book") is a collection of internationally recognized standards, codes of practice, guidelines and other recommendations relating to foods, food production and food safety. Its name derives from the Codex Alimentarius Austriacus.[1] Its texts are developed and maintained by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, a body that was established in 1963 by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). The Commission's main aims are stated as being to protect the health of consumers and ensure fair practices in the international food trade. The Codex Alimentarius is recognized by the World Trade Organization as an international reference point for the resolution of disputes concerning food safety and consumer protection.[2][3]
SCOPE:
The Codex Alimentarius officially covers all foods, whether processed, semi-processed or raw, but far more attention has been given to foods that are marketed directly to consumers. In addition to standards for specific foods, the Codex Alimentarius contains general standards covering matters such as food labeling, food hygiene, food additives and pesticide residues, and procedures for assessing the safety of foods derived from modern biotechnology. It also contains guidelines for the management of official (i.e., governmental) import and export inspection and certification systems for foods.
The Codex Alimentarius is published in Arabic, Chinese, English, French and Spanish. Not all texts are available in all languages.
[edit] General texts
Food labelling (general standard, guidelines on nutrition labelling, guidelines on labelling claims)
Food additives (general standard including authorized uses, specifications for food grade chemicals)
Contaminants in foods (general standard, tolerances for specific contaminants including radionuclides, aflatoxins and other mycotoxins)
Pesticide and veterinary chemical residues in foods (maximum residue limits)
Risk assessment procedures for determining the safety of foods derived from biotechnology (DNA-modified plants, DNA-modified micro-organisms, allergens)
Food hygiene (general principles, codes of hygienic practice in specific industries or food handling establishments, guidelines for the use of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point or “HACCP” system)
Methods of analysis and sampling
[edit] Specific standards
Meat products (fresh, frozen, processed meats and poultry)
Fish and fishery products (marine, fresh water and aquaculture)
Milk and milk products
Foods for special dietary uses (including infant formulae and baby foods)
Fresh and processed vegetables, fruits, and fruit juices
Cereals and derived products, dried legumes
Fats, oils and derived products such as margarine
Miscellaneous food products (chocolate, sugar, honey, mineral water)
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:19 am
THE CONTROVERSY:
The controversy over the Codex Alimentarius relates to a perception that it is a mandatory standard for food - including vitamin and mineral supplement - safety. Supporters of the Codex Alimentarius say that it is a voluntary reference standard for food and that there is no obligation on countries to adopt Codex standards as a member of either Codex or any other international trade organization. From the point of view of its opponents, however, one of the main causes of concern is that the Codex Alimentarius is recognized by the World Trade Organization as an international reference standard for the resolution of disputes concerning food safety and consumer protection.[2][4]. Proponents argue that the use of Codex Alimentarius during international disputes does not exclude the use of other references or scientific studies as evidence of food safety and consumer protection. Nevertheless, although countries are not excluded from using other references or scientific studies as evidence of food safety and consumer protection, opponents claim that developing countries in particular are unlikely to have alternative references.[citation needed]
Much of the controversy relates to the way in which the Codex Alimentarius treats vitamin and mineral food supplements. Some countries categorize vitamin and mineral supplements as foods. Others, however, categorize them as drugs. Meanwhile, some countries, such as Canada, have created separate non-drug categories for these products. Opponents of the Codex Alimentarius Commission claim that it is unduly influenced by pharmaceutical companies, and that its guidelines for vitamin and mineral food supplements are unnecessarily restrictive.
It is reported that in 1996 the German delegation put forward a proposal that no herb, vitamin or mineral should be sold for preventive or therapeutic reasons, and that supplements should be reclassified as drugs.[5] The proposal was agreed, but protests halted its implementation.[5] The 28th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission was subsequently held July 4 - July 9, 2005.[6] Among the many issues discussed were the "Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements"[7], which were adopted during the meeting as new global safety guidelines.[8] This text has been the subject of considerable controversy, in part because many member countries may choose to regulate dietary supplements as therapeutic goods or pharmaceuticals or by some other category. The text does not seek to ban supplements, but subjects them to labeling and packaging requirements, sets criteria for the setting of maximum and minimum dosage levels, and requires that safety and efficacy are considered when determining ingredient sources. The United Nations has stated that the guidelines are to "stop consumers overdosing on vitamin and mineral food supplements."[9]
The Guidelines have attracted concern from both consumers and industry due to a perception that there may be restrictions on vitamins and minerals as dietary supplements. The health freedom movement has pointed to concerns related to similarities between the EU's Food Supplements Directive and the Codex Alimentarius Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Supplements.[10]
Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul has said that the Central American Free Trade Agreement "increases the possibility that Codex regulations will be imposed on the American public."[11][/color]
The controversy over the Codex Alimentarius relates to a perception that it is a mandatory standard for food - including vitamin and mineral supplement - safety. Supporters of the Codex Alimentarius say that it is a voluntary reference standard for food and that there is no obligation on countries to adopt Codex standards as a member of either Codex or any other international trade organization. From the point of view of its opponents, however, one of the main causes of concern is that the Codex Alimentarius is recognized by the World Trade Organization as an international reference standard for the resolution of disputes concerning food safety and consumer protection.[2][4]. Proponents argue that the use of Codex Alimentarius during international disputes does not exclude the use of other references or scientific studies as evidence of food safety and consumer protection. Nevertheless, although countries are not excluded from using other references or scientific studies as evidence of food safety and consumer protection, opponents claim that developing countries in particular are unlikely to have alternative references.[citation needed]
Much of the controversy relates to the way in which the Codex Alimentarius treats vitamin and mineral food supplements. Some countries categorize vitamin and mineral supplements as foods. Others, however, categorize them as drugs. Meanwhile, some countries, such as Canada, have created separate non-drug categories for these products. Opponents of the Codex Alimentarius Commission claim that it is unduly influenced by pharmaceutical companies, and that its guidelines for vitamin and mineral food supplements are unnecessarily restrictive.
It is reported that in 1996 the German delegation put forward a proposal that no herb, vitamin or mineral should be sold for preventive or therapeutic reasons, and that supplements should be reclassified as drugs.[5] The proposal was agreed, but protests halted its implementation.[5] The 28th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission was subsequently held July 4 - July 9, 2005.[6] Among the many issues discussed were the "Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements"[7], which were adopted during the meeting as new global safety guidelines.[8] This text has been the subject of considerable controversy, in part because many member countries may choose to regulate dietary supplements as therapeutic goods or pharmaceuticals or by some other category. The text does not seek to ban supplements, but subjects them to labeling and packaging requirements, sets criteria for the setting of maximum and minimum dosage levels, and requires that safety and efficacy are considered when determining ingredient sources. The United Nations has stated that the guidelines are to "stop consumers overdosing on vitamin and mineral food supplements."[9]
The Guidelines have attracted concern from both consumers and industry due to a perception that there may be restrictions on vitamins and minerals as dietary supplements. The health freedom movement has pointed to concerns related to similarities between the EU's Food Supplements Directive and the Codex Alimentarius Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Supplements.[10]
Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul has said that the Central American Free Trade Agreement "increases the possibility that Codex regulations will be imposed on the American public."[11][/color]
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:20 am
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:20 am
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:21 am
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:21 am
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:21 am
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:22 am
GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) – The hidden agenda of
Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) - The hidden agenda of
GMO, as the term implies, is organism whose genetic has been modified by techniques of genetic engineering generally known as recombinant DNA technology. The application of GMO is rather diverse from animals to plants and fungi of all kinds. Its purpose too are varied, chief among them is to better food production for mankind.
The process to benefit mankind, however, has been extremely slow due to many justified and unjustified fears. Oppositions came mostly from the application in plantation. The GMO plants are pest resistance, herbicides, better nutrition value, longer shelf-life and many more.
Then why are all the noises? First, since GM plants are grown on open field, they are often associated with environmental pollution. This is especially true in Europe. Another concern is the meddling of limited human knowledge to the evolution of Mother Nature. Some critics have raised the fear of out-crossing as the process is known in threatening the survival of the wild and indigenous plants.
But is the controversy justified? Should we continue to drag our feet in food production to satisfy "Terminator" - a word dubbed to mean over technology protection on hypothetical ground? Should we continue to ban GMO practice to the detrimental of world hunger? Should we continue to employ some trade tactics such as stringent Food safety, un-practical Traceability, over detail Food labeling and the like to deter GMO advancement?
My answer is "No" and "No". Throughout my participation in the Codex meetings of many Food Committees from 1993-2005, I learned that the real issue behind all the debates of GMO is actually Economy. There were always two sides of the argument led by the American pro and the E.U. con. In the early years of the Code introduction, E.U. would go totally against the idea with suggestion to bar the practice. Later, when the tide became high, E.U. opted to the call on food security in GMO production.
The opened secret behind the scene at that time was not strictly GMO by itself but the pace in developing GMO technology. Tailing far behind USA. EU needed more time to learn and develop GMO technology before it would allow GMO to grow. USA with more advance knowledge in the field, would rather spear ahead for production and reap profit. Certainly, this difference was never discussed on the table. It was always problem of strict food labeling to protect GMO consumer or this and that. All these involve a great amount of time in Codec Alimentarius procedure to work out a world consensus food code. The problem was not the matter of whether GMO good or bad. The ultimate intention was to catch up with technology through time buying tactic. I heard E.U. has a better attitude for GMO and is on the way to share the profitable GMO production with USA now.
Back home in Thailand, the outcries were more serious. Farmers dumped trucks load of Papaya and Tapioca in front of the Parliament in protest against GMO plants. The prime reason cited was the fear of the extinction of local papaya species through pollen mutation. The opened secret to the problem, however, is really an economic one. Farmers were unhappy that superior GMO papaya may affect income. Abundant production means lower price for them. But we never hear they give such a problem as reason against GMO.
So, this is why we have all the objections to GMO throughout these past years. Yet, I am sure the intensity will subside now that EU has somewhat caught up with the technology. Also farmers realized now that GMO papaya can hold up to much longer storage time suitable for export that means higher values for their papaya production.
Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) – The hidden agenda of
Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) - The hidden agenda of
GMO, as the term implies, is organism whose genetic has been modified by techniques of genetic engineering generally known as recombinant DNA technology. The application of GMO is rather diverse from animals to plants and fungi of all kinds. Its purpose too are varied, chief among them is to better food production for mankind.
The process to benefit mankind, however, has been extremely slow due to many justified and unjustified fears. Oppositions came mostly from the application in plantation. The GMO plants are pest resistance, herbicides, better nutrition value, longer shelf-life and many more.
Then why are all the noises? First, since GM plants are grown on open field, they are often associated with environmental pollution. This is especially true in Europe. Another concern is the meddling of limited human knowledge to the evolution of Mother Nature. Some critics have raised the fear of out-crossing as the process is known in threatening the survival of the wild and indigenous plants.
But is the controversy justified? Should we continue to drag our feet in food production to satisfy "Terminator" - a word dubbed to mean over technology protection on hypothetical ground? Should we continue to ban GMO practice to the detrimental of world hunger? Should we continue to employ some trade tactics such as stringent Food safety, un-practical Traceability, over detail Food labeling and the like to deter GMO advancement?
My answer is "No" and "No". Throughout my participation in the Codex meetings of many Food Committees from 1993-2005, I learned that the real issue behind all the debates of GMO is actually Economy. There were always two sides of the argument led by the American pro and the E.U. con. In the early years of the Code introduction, E.U. would go totally against the idea with suggestion to bar the practice. Later, when the tide became high, E.U. opted to the call on food security in GMO production.
The opened secret behind the scene at that time was not strictly GMO by itself but the pace in developing GMO technology. Tailing far behind USA. EU needed more time to learn and develop GMO technology before it would allow GMO to grow. USA with more advance knowledge in the field, would rather spear ahead for production and reap profit. Certainly, this difference was never discussed on the table. It was always problem of strict food labeling to protect GMO consumer or this and that. All these involve a great amount of time in Codec Alimentarius procedure to work out a world consensus food code. The problem was not the matter of whether GMO good or bad. The ultimate intention was to catch up with technology through time buying tactic. I heard E.U. has a better attitude for GMO and is on the way to share the profitable GMO production with USA now.
Back home in Thailand, the outcries were more serious. Farmers dumped trucks load of Papaya and Tapioca in front of the Parliament in protest against GMO plants. The prime reason cited was the fear of the extinction of local papaya species through pollen mutation. The opened secret to the problem, however, is really an economic one. Farmers were unhappy that superior GMO papaya may affect income. Abundant production means lower price for them. But we never hear they give such a problem as reason against GMO.
So, this is why we have all the objections to GMO throughout these past years. Yet, I am sure the intensity will subside now that EU has somewhat caught up with the technology. Also farmers realized now that GMO papaya can hold up to much longer storage time suitable for export that means higher values for their papaya production.
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:22 am
GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:23 am
GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:23 am
GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:23 am
GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:24 am
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:45 am
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:46 am
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:47 am
PLEASE ACCESS THIS BLOG, IT IS SO EDUCATIONAL:http://educateb4uvaccinate.multiply.com/journal/item/25/Top_Ten_Concerns_About_the_Future_of_Vaccination
Top Ten Concerns About the Future of Vaccination
By Dan Schultz, DC
I recently reviewed the Institute for International Research's article, What Are the Top Ten Challenges Cited By Scientists in Vaccines Development? . Wow. Oddly, there were no concerns cited whatsoever regarding the many, many safety issues that stare us in the face. So, I compiled my own top ten list -- you may call it a rebuttal or a reality check -- of the concerns for our future.
Top Ten Concerns About the Future of Vaccination
1. Overvaccination
Many scientists have serious concerns that the human immune and nervous systems did not evolve with any adaptive mechanisms to parenteral (injected) administration of substances. We simply don't know what kind of long-term effects injecting chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum, and many other toxic compounds like genetically modified, chemically denatured viruses and bacteria directly into the human blood stream. (See Precautions Not a Priority and New Study: Americans May Be Overvaccinated)
Vaccination is an offense against nature. In the 1800s, we started with just one vaccine -- smallpox -- and in 1982, it was 23 doses of seven vaccines. Until recently it was 48 doses of 14 vaccines by age 6 and now they've added annual flu shots for our kids, HPV and there's more to come. Many more. Meanwhile, there has never been even one long-term safety study for any vaccine in the history of vaccines.
2. Aluminum Toxicity
It took hundreds of years to eliminate (and we still haven't fully accomplished it) mercury from all of medicines "cures." From Blue mass, to Mercurochrome, to "silver" fillings, to thimerosal, this extremely neurotoxic chemical has been approved, used, and banned in so many cases now that pretty much everyone knows that mercury is not a good thing to have in your body. What about aluminum? Well, aluminum has been conclusively linked to Alzheimer's Disease, fibromyalgia, and other neurological disorders. No one knows what else, because no one is much interested in studying what happens, especially, when aluminum is parenterally (injected) into the human system. If history is any barometer, we do know it will take decades to get it out of vaccines. (See Is Aluminum the New Thimerosal? and Aluminum in Vaccines at www.novaccine.com)
3. Microbial Adaptation
Most people already know that flu viruses mutate faster (See Cause of Flu Epidemics Uncovered) than we can make vaccine for them, and a lot of it's guesswork anyway. For example, the medical industry admitted that this year's flu vaccine was worthless. But there are more serious consequences for messing with Mother nature. Germs fight back with vengeance. “Nature abhors a vacuum,” University of Texas microbiologist Danielle Garsin, PhD explains. “If you kill off some of the harmful bacteria, you leave an opening in which another strain can take advantage of that situation.” The superbugs that developed as a result have been a frightening example of the growing problem of antibiotic resistance. (See A Superbug Evolves). A recent Journal of American Medical Association found that "strains not included in the Prevnar vaccine were becoming more numerous and more resistant to standard antibiotics." (See Drug-Resistant Infections Gaining Traction in U.S.)
4. Immunosupression
People are getting more and more sick. We don't need studies, just ask around. Ask your grandmother, aunts and uncles how many medications their taking and for how many illnesses. Ask you high school administrator for the numbers of students on Ritalin and Anti-depressants. Viera Scheibner, PhD states "the New England Journal of Medicine published in 1984 that tetanus booster injections result in the same derangement of T4 and T8 cells as seen in AIDS patients. A 'mysterious' new syndrome emerged in the US: thousands of children are developing AIDS symptoms (with deranged T4 and T8 cells) without being HIV positive. My well-considered opinion is that it comes from that T (standing for tetanus) in the DPT vaccine." (Viera Scheibner Quote)
5. Widespread Allergic and Asthmatic Conditions
When substances are parenterally administered into the human blood stream, the body reacts to the foreign proteins and often creates an allergy, which is exactly what has been shown to happen with latex and gelatin, among other ingredients in vaccines (See Allergy and Vaccinations). One University of Manitoba researcher found that vaccines can cause an allergic reaction and researchers are speculating whether children's immune systems are better able to handle the vaccine's side-effects when they're older. "Children who have their first routine vaccination delayed by more than four months cut their risk of asthma (a form of allergy) in half." Reaction can be acute and more severe, as well. "Three schoolchildren were taken to the intensive care of the city hospital with the most serious allergic reaction - Quincke's edema – after vaccination against influenza. Three boys aged 7, 10, and 11 were taken to hospital from three different schools (See Three Children Taken to Intensive Care After Vaccination Against Influenza). An article in the Guardian recently stated "The number of people prone to severe, sometimes fatal, allergic reactions has accelerated dramatically over the last two years… possible causes could include pollution or vaccines, but experts stressed more research needed to be done. Of particular concern is the sharp rise in the number of young children who are suffering."
6. Future Pandemics/Epidemics.
As one researcher, Andrew Moniotis, PhD convincingly demonstrates in How to Predict Epidemics, that it's uncanny how vaccination has preceded epidemics throughout history. The medical people like to parrot claims that vaccines have eradicated disease, but it's simply not true. Read your history. Get educated. While some are already recognize epidemics of diabetes, obesity, chronic inflammatory disease, and neurological conditions -- all of which can be linked to increased vaccinations -- I wonder what other kinds of epidemics can result from such human experimentation.
7. New Man-Made Diseases.
One must consider the disastrous potential of "monkeying with nature" and the very real possibility of creating new and more dangerous organic matter (bacteria or viruses) that nature did not equip us to handle. No one knows what will happen, but we do know what happened when they made the polio vaccine. Millions of doses of the polio vaccine were contaminated with SV40, a virus picked up from monkey kidney tissue in vaccine production, it was conclusively determined to have caused an untold number of cancers. I invite you to consider the facts involved in the creation of a man-made virus called the Human Immunodeficiency Virus. I recommend viewing the video The Origin of AIDS.
8. Full Corporate Control. Many argue that the pharmaceutical companies already have pervaded all aspects of health care and government policy-making. No longer does the government or universities conduct independent studies on safety or efficacy, but, in most cases, rely on drug company grants or the drug companies simply do the studies themselves. Big pharma representatives occupy most government policy-making positions, and/or influence the decision makers. As in the recent HPV marketing blitz, the drug companies have massive monetary resources available to lobby and push their products through approval and mandates. Nearly every approved vaccine eventually has been mandated nationwide. But it can get worse.
9. Adult Mandates
As the growth potential of the vaccine market taps out the child/infant demographic, the next target is adults. Demographic targets have been shifted before. The Hepatitis B target group was initially adults (IV drug users and homosexuals) and the drug companies mandated it for newborns when they couldn't sell enough. Now it appears that adult revaccination (boosters) and new adult vaccines (like experimental AIDS vaccines) may be the best financial opportunity for vaccine manufacturers. Watch for the resurgence of government fines, tax penalties, jail time, withholding welfare benefits, etc., and a national registry.
10. The AIDS Vaccine
Because HIV is not the cause of AIDS (See the video HIV: The Greatest Medical Hoax of Our Time) and simply the scapegoat for newly named immunosupression, there can never be any legitimately "effective" vaccine, but political and profit-making forces will likely create one. And since, historically, vaccines have proven their ability to cause the disease they are made to protect people from, lining up and getting this shot in the arm may be dicey. (See Vaccines That Caused the Disease They Were Meant to Prevent.)
link: http://blog.novaccine.com/
Prev: Meningitis (HiB) Vaccine Proven to Cause Diabetes
Next: HISTORICAL FACTS EXPOSING THE DANGERS AND INEFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINES
Top Ten Concerns About the Future of Vaccination
By Dan Schultz, DC
I recently reviewed the Institute for International Research's article, What Are the Top Ten Challenges Cited By Scientists in Vaccines Development? . Wow. Oddly, there were no concerns cited whatsoever regarding the many, many safety issues that stare us in the face. So, I compiled my own top ten list -- you may call it a rebuttal or a reality check -- of the concerns for our future.
Top Ten Concerns About the Future of Vaccination
1. Overvaccination
Many scientists have serious concerns that the human immune and nervous systems did not evolve with any adaptive mechanisms to parenteral (injected) administration of substances. We simply don't know what kind of long-term effects injecting chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum, and many other toxic compounds like genetically modified, chemically denatured viruses and bacteria directly into the human blood stream. (See Precautions Not a Priority and New Study: Americans May Be Overvaccinated)
Vaccination is an offense against nature. In the 1800s, we started with just one vaccine -- smallpox -- and in 1982, it was 23 doses of seven vaccines. Until recently it was 48 doses of 14 vaccines by age 6 and now they've added annual flu shots for our kids, HPV and there's more to come. Many more. Meanwhile, there has never been even one long-term safety study for any vaccine in the history of vaccines.
2. Aluminum Toxicity
It took hundreds of years to eliminate (and we still haven't fully accomplished it) mercury from all of medicines "cures." From Blue mass, to Mercurochrome, to "silver" fillings, to thimerosal, this extremely neurotoxic chemical has been approved, used, and banned in so many cases now that pretty much everyone knows that mercury is not a good thing to have in your body. What about aluminum? Well, aluminum has been conclusively linked to Alzheimer's Disease, fibromyalgia, and other neurological disorders. No one knows what else, because no one is much interested in studying what happens, especially, when aluminum is parenterally (injected) into the human system. If history is any barometer, we do know it will take decades to get it out of vaccines. (See Is Aluminum the New Thimerosal? and Aluminum in Vaccines at www.novaccine.com)
3. Microbial Adaptation
Most people already know that flu viruses mutate faster (See Cause of Flu Epidemics Uncovered) than we can make vaccine for them, and a lot of it's guesswork anyway. For example, the medical industry admitted that this year's flu vaccine was worthless. But there are more serious consequences for messing with Mother nature. Germs fight back with vengeance. “Nature abhors a vacuum,” University of Texas microbiologist Danielle Garsin, PhD explains. “If you kill off some of the harmful bacteria, you leave an opening in which another strain can take advantage of that situation.” The superbugs that developed as a result have been a frightening example of the growing problem of antibiotic resistance. (See A Superbug Evolves). A recent Journal of American Medical Association found that "strains not included in the Prevnar vaccine were becoming more numerous and more resistant to standard antibiotics." (See Drug-Resistant Infections Gaining Traction in U.S.)
4. Immunosupression
People are getting more and more sick. We don't need studies, just ask around. Ask your grandmother, aunts and uncles how many medications their taking and for how many illnesses. Ask you high school administrator for the numbers of students on Ritalin and Anti-depressants. Viera Scheibner, PhD states "the New England Journal of Medicine published in 1984 that tetanus booster injections result in the same derangement of T4 and T8 cells as seen in AIDS patients. A 'mysterious' new syndrome emerged in the US: thousands of children are developing AIDS symptoms (with deranged T4 and T8 cells) without being HIV positive. My well-considered opinion is that it comes from that T (standing for tetanus) in the DPT vaccine." (Viera Scheibner Quote)
5. Widespread Allergic and Asthmatic Conditions
When substances are parenterally administered into the human blood stream, the body reacts to the foreign proteins and often creates an allergy, which is exactly what has been shown to happen with latex and gelatin, among other ingredients in vaccines (See Allergy and Vaccinations). One University of Manitoba researcher found that vaccines can cause an allergic reaction and researchers are speculating whether children's immune systems are better able to handle the vaccine's side-effects when they're older. "Children who have their first routine vaccination delayed by more than four months cut their risk of asthma (a form of allergy) in half." Reaction can be acute and more severe, as well. "Three schoolchildren were taken to the intensive care of the city hospital with the most serious allergic reaction - Quincke's edema – after vaccination against influenza. Three boys aged 7, 10, and 11 were taken to hospital from three different schools (See Three Children Taken to Intensive Care After Vaccination Against Influenza). An article in the Guardian recently stated "The number of people prone to severe, sometimes fatal, allergic reactions has accelerated dramatically over the last two years… possible causes could include pollution or vaccines, but experts stressed more research needed to be done. Of particular concern is the sharp rise in the number of young children who are suffering."
6. Future Pandemics/Epidemics.
As one researcher, Andrew Moniotis, PhD convincingly demonstrates in How to Predict Epidemics, that it's uncanny how vaccination has preceded epidemics throughout history. The medical people like to parrot claims that vaccines have eradicated disease, but it's simply not true. Read your history. Get educated. While some are already recognize epidemics of diabetes, obesity, chronic inflammatory disease, and neurological conditions -- all of which can be linked to increased vaccinations -- I wonder what other kinds of epidemics can result from such human experimentation.
7. New Man-Made Diseases.
One must consider the disastrous potential of "monkeying with nature" and the very real possibility of creating new and more dangerous organic matter (bacteria or viruses) that nature did not equip us to handle. No one knows what will happen, but we do know what happened when they made the polio vaccine. Millions of doses of the polio vaccine were contaminated with SV40, a virus picked up from monkey kidney tissue in vaccine production, it was conclusively determined to have caused an untold number of cancers. I invite you to consider the facts involved in the creation of a man-made virus called the Human Immunodeficiency Virus. I recommend viewing the video The Origin of AIDS.
8. Full Corporate Control. Many argue that the pharmaceutical companies already have pervaded all aspects of health care and government policy-making. No longer does the government or universities conduct independent studies on safety or efficacy, but, in most cases, rely on drug company grants or the drug companies simply do the studies themselves. Big pharma representatives occupy most government policy-making positions, and/or influence the decision makers. As in the recent HPV marketing blitz, the drug companies have massive monetary resources available to lobby and push their products through approval and mandates. Nearly every approved vaccine eventually has been mandated nationwide. But it can get worse.
9. Adult Mandates
As the growth potential of the vaccine market taps out the child/infant demographic, the next target is adults. Demographic targets have been shifted before. The Hepatitis B target group was initially adults (IV drug users and homosexuals) and the drug companies mandated it for newborns when they couldn't sell enough. Now it appears that adult revaccination (boosters) and new adult vaccines (like experimental AIDS vaccines) may be the best financial opportunity for vaccine manufacturers. Watch for the resurgence of government fines, tax penalties, jail time, withholding welfare benefits, etc., and a national registry.
10. The AIDS Vaccine
Because HIV is not the cause of AIDS (See the video HIV: The Greatest Medical Hoax of Our Time) and simply the scapegoat for newly named immunosupression, there can never be any legitimately "effective" vaccine, but political and profit-making forces will likely create one. And since, historically, vaccines have proven their ability to cause the disease they are made to protect people from, lining up and getting this shot in the arm may be dicey. (See Vaccines That Caused the Disease They Were Meant to Prevent.)
link: http://blog.novaccine.com/
Prev: Meningitis (HiB) Vaccine Proven to Cause Diabetes
Next: HISTORICAL FACTS EXPOSING THE DANGERS AND INEFFECTIVENESS OF VACCINES
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:49 am
THIS LINK WILL SHOW US THE COMPLETE LAWS ON SALT IODIZATION CALLED A.S.I.N. LAW (ACT FOR SALT IODIZATION NATIONWIDE) -http://www.chanrobles.com/republicactno8172.htm
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8172
.
AN ACT PROMOTING SALT IODIZATION NATIONWIDE AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.
Section 1. Title. — This Act shall be known as "An Act for Salt Iodization Nationwide (ASIN)."
Sec. 2. Declaration of Policy. — It is hereby declared the policy of the State to protect and promote the health of the people, to maintain an effective food regulatory system, and to provide the entire population especially women and children with proper nutrition. For this purpose, the State shall promote the nutritional fortification of food to combat micronutrient as a priority health program for the nation.
Sec. 3. Purposes. — The purposes of this Act are to:chan robles virtual law library
(a) contribute to the elimination of micronutrient malnutrition in the country, particularly iodine deficiency disorders, through the cost-effective preventive measure of salt iodization;
chan robles virtual law library
(b) require all producers manufacturers of food-grade salt to iodize the salt that they produce, manufacture, import, trade or distribute;
(c) require the Department of Health (DOH) to undertake the salt iodization program and for its Bureau of Food and Drugs (BFAD), to set and enforce standards for food-grade iodized salt and to monitor compliance thereof by the food-grade salt manufacturers;
(d) require the Local Government Units (LGUs), through their health officers and nutritionists/dietitians, or in their absence through their sanitary inspectors, to check and monitor the quality of food-grade salt being sold in their market in order to ascertain that such salt is properly iodized:chan robles virtual law library
(e) require the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to regulate and monitor trading of iodized salt:
(f) direct the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), in collaboration with the Technology and Livelihood Resource Center (TLRC), to initiate, promote, and cause the transfer of technology for salt iodization:
(g) authorize the National Nutrition Council (NNC), the policy-making and coordinating body on nutrition, to serve as the advisory board on salt iodization:
(h) provide mechanisms and incentives for the local salt industry in the production, marketing and distribution of iodized salt, and
(i) ensure the sustainability of the salt iodization program.
Sec. 4. Definition of Terms. — For purposes of this Act the following terms shall mean:
(a) Micronutrient malnutrition. — a disorder resulting from deficiencies vitamin A, iron, iodine and other micronutrients which the body needs in minute quantities everyday.
chan robles virtual law library
(b) Iodine deficiency disorder's. — a broad spectrum of deficiencies resulting from lack of iodine in the diet which leads to the reduction of intellectual and physical capacity affecting everyone who is iodine-deficiency and may manifest as goiter, mental retardation, physical and mental defects, and cretinism.
(c) Food fortification. — the addition of nutrients to processed foods at levels above the natural state.
(d) Salt iodization. — the addition of iodine to salt intended for human or animal consumption in accordance with specifications as to form, fortificant, method, manner and composition as may be prescribed by the BFAD
(e) Food-grade salt. — salt for human and animal consumption as distinguished from industrial salt.
(f) Regulatory requirements. — the provisions of all applicable laws, regulations, executive orders, and other enactments related to food quality and safety, purity, nutritional composition, and other aspects of food regulation or control.
(g) Industrial salt. — salt used in the treatment, processing, and/or manufacture of non-food commercial products.
(h) Manufacturer. — one who products imports trades in and distributes salt.
(i) Subsistence producer manufacturer. — one who produces, trades in or distributes salt not exceeding two metric tons (2 m.t) of salt per year.
(j) Small producer/manufacturer. — one who produces, imports trades in, or distributes salt ranging from more than two metric tons (2 m.t.) to three hundred metric tons (300 m.t.) per year.
(k) Medium producer manufacturer. — one who products, imports, trades in, or distributes salt ranging from more than three hundred metric tons (300 m.t.) to two thousand metric tons (2,000 m.t.) per year.
(l) Large producer manufacturer. — one who produces, imports trades in, or distributes salt exceeding two thousand metric tons (2,000 m.t.) per year.
Sec. 5. Application. — (a) Thus Act shall apply to the entire salt industry, including salt producers/manufacturers, importers, traders, and distributors as well as government and non-government agencies involved in salt iodization activities.
chan robles virtual law library
(b) Iodized salt that conforms to the standards set by the BFAD to meet national nutritional needs shall be made available to consumers Provided, That the implementation of this Act shall be enforced over a staggered period of one (1) year for large and medium producers manufacturers, two (2) years for small producers/manufacturers; and five (5) years for subsistence producers/manufacturers.
(c) All food outlets, restaurants, and stores are hereby required to make available to customers only iodized salt in their establishment upon effectivity of this Act. These establishments shall be monitored with the help of the LGUs through its health officers and nutritionists/dietitians, or in their absence, the sanitary inspectors to check and monitor the quality of food-grade salt being sold or served in such establishments.chan robles virtual law library
(d) In areas endemic to iodine deficiency disorders, iodized salt shall be made available Local government officials at the provincial and municipal levels shall provide mechanisms to ensure enforcement of this provision through ordinances and public information campaigns.
(e) All food manufacturers processors using food-grade salt are also required to use iodized salt in the processing of their products and must comply with the provisions of this Act not later than one (1) year from its effectivity. Provided, That the use of iodized salt shall not prejudice the quality and safety of their food products: Provided, however, That the burden of proof and testing for any prejudicial effects due to iodized salt fortification lies on the said food manufacturers/processor.
(f) Salt producers/manufacturers shall register with the BFAD, which shall maintain updated registry of salt producers/manufacturers and shall monitor compliance with the salt iodization program.
(g) All food-grade salt shall be labeled in a manner that is true and accurate, not likely to mislead purchasers and in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the BFAD.
(h) For a period of three (3) years from the effectivity of this Act, the DOH shall provide free iodized salt to indigents residing in sixth class municipalities as may be allowed by their annual appropriations.
Sec. 6. Support to the Salt Industry. — The following agencies and institutions shall support the salt iodization program through their respective internal programs.
(a) the DTI is hereby required to assist and support local salt producers/manufacturers in upgrading their production technologies to include iodization by helping them obtain soft loans and financial assistance for the procurement of salt iodization machines, packaging equipment and technology and fortificant and by ensuring the systematic distribution of the iodized salt in the market.
chan robles virtual law library
(b) the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) shall assist the formation of cooperatives of local salt producers/manufacturers in order that they can economically engage in salt iodization and distribution of iodized salt:
(c) the DOST in collaboration with the TLRC, shall develop and implement comprehensive programs for the acquisition of design and manufacture of salt iodization machines and transfer of salt iodization technology to small and subsistence local salt producers/manufacturers; and
(d) the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and other appropriate government agencies shall identify areas that are suitable for use as salt farms with the purpose of protecting such areas from environmental risks to ensure sustainability of iodized salt production.
Sec. 7. Public Information. — The benefits and rationale of the use of iodized salt shall be adequately disseminated and promoted through organized, systematic and nationwide information campaign which shall involve major sectors of society to be spearheaded by the DOH, in cooperation and coordination with the LGUs and other agencies concerned, particularly the Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS), the Philippine Information Agency (PIA), provincial science centers, private sector, and students.
chan robles virtual law library
The implementing agency, in coordination with the PIA, shall seek the cooperation of the media sector to assist in public information dissemination. Salt iodization and its benefits shall also be included and given emphasis in all levels of health subjects in both public and private schools.
Sec. 8. The Salt Iodization Advisory Board. — The National Nutrition Council (NNC), as presently composed, including representatives of the DENR, the medical profession and the salt manufacturers shall serve as the salt iodization advisory board and shall function as the policy and coordinating body on salt iodization programs and activities. It shall coordinate the efforts of all agencies concerned and monitor the implementation of the provisions of this Act. It shall also submit an annual report to the Congress of the Philippines on the progress of the salt iodization program and offer recommendations for its improvements.chan robles virtual law library
Sec. 9. Sanctions. — The procedures for imposing sanctions under this Act and for inspecting and investigating the premises where any salt is received, held, manufactured, labeled, stored, displayed, delivered, distributed, sold, or located. or where it is reasonably believed these activities are being carried out or where salt is located, shall be in accordance with the provisions of Republic Act No. 3720, otherwise known as the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended: Provided, That any person, whether natural or juridical, who violates any of the provisions of this Act or any of the rules and regulations promulgated for its effective implementation shall be punished by a fine of not less than One thousand pesos (P1,000) nor more than One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000): Provided, however, That if the violation is committed by any officer, director or member of a business and a juridical entity acting beyond the scope of his authority, such officer, director or member responsible therefor shall be personally liable for the fine: Provided, further, That such violator shall suffer a revocation of its business permit and/or a ban of its product from the market: Provided, finally, That the BFAD, in coordination with the LGUs concerned, shall be authorized to impose and collect the fines from the violators, and such collections shall accrue to the BFAD for its use in the implementation if this Act.
Sec. 10. Appropriations. — The amount necessary for the implementation of this Act shall initially be charged to the appropriations of the agencies concerned as may be appropriated, under the current General Appropriations Act. Thereafter, such amount as may be necessary for its implementation shall be included in the annual General Appropriations Act.
Sec. 11. Implementing Rules and Regulations. — The DOH in cooperation with the agencies concerned shall formulate the necessary rules and regulations for the effective implementation of this Act within sixty (60) days from its approval.
Sec. 12. Separability Clause. — If any portion of this Act is declared invalid, the remainder of this Act shall not be affected by such declaration and shall remain valid and enforceable.chan robles virtual law library
Sec. 13. Effectivity Clause. — This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in the Official Gazette or in two (2) national newspaper of general circulation, whichever is earlier.
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8172
.
AN ACT PROMOTING SALT IODIZATION NATIONWIDE AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.
Section 1. Title. — This Act shall be known as "An Act for Salt Iodization Nationwide (ASIN)."
Sec. 2. Declaration of Policy. — It is hereby declared the policy of the State to protect and promote the health of the people, to maintain an effective food regulatory system, and to provide the entire population especially women and children with proper nutrition. For this purpose, the State shall promote the nutritional fortification of food to combat micronutrient as a priority health program for the nation.
Sec. 3. Purposes. — The purposes of this Act are to:chan robles virtual law library
(a) contribute to the elimination of micronutrient malnutrition in the country, particularly iodine deficiency disorders, through the cost-effective preventive measure of salt iodization;
chan robles virtual law library
(b) require all producers manufacturers of food-grade salt to iodize the salt that they produce, manufacture, import, trade or distribute;
(c) require the Department of Health (DOH) to undertake the salt iodization program and for its Bureau of Food and Drugs (BFAD), to set and enforce standards for food-grade iodized salt and to monitor compliance thereof by the food-grade salt manufacturers;
(d) require the Local Government Units (LGUs), through their health officers and nutritionists/dietitians, or in their absence through their sanitary inspectors, to check and monitor the quality of food-grade salt being sold in their market in order to ascertain that such salt is properly iodized:chan robles virtual law library
(e) require the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to regulate and monitor trading of iodized salt:
(f) direct the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), in collaboration with the Technology and Livelihood Resource Center (TLRC), to initiate, promote, and cause the transfer of technology for salt iodization:
(g) authorize the National Nutrition Council (NNC), the policy-making and coordinating body on nutrition, to serve as the advisory board on salt iodization:
(h) provide mechanisms and incentives for the local salt industry in the production, marketing and distribution of iodized salt, and
(i) ensure the sustainability of the salt iodization program.
Sec. 4. Definition of Terms. — For purposes of this Act the following terms shall mean:
(a) Micronutrient malnutrition. — a disorder resulting from deficiencies vitamin A, iron, iodine and other micronutrients which the body needs in minute quantities everyday.
chan robles virtual law library
(b) Iodine deficiency disorder's. — a broad spectrum of deficiencies resulting from lack of iodine in the diet which leads to the reduction of intellectual and physical capacity affecting everyone who is iodine-deficiency and may manifest as goiter, mental retardation, physical and mental defects, and cretinism.
(c) Food fortification. — the addition of nutrients to processed foods at levels above the natural state.
(d) Salt iodization. — the addition of iodine to salt intended for human or animal consumption in accordance with specifications as to form, fortificant, method, manner and composition as may be prescribed by the BFAD
(e) Food-grade salt. — salt for human and animal consumption as distinguished from industrial salt.
(f) Regulatory requirements. — the provisions of all applicable laws, regulations, executive orders, and other enactments related to food quality and safety, purity, nutritional composition, and other aspects of food regulation or control.
(g) Industrial salt. — salt used in the treatment, processing, and/or manufacture of non-food commercial products.
(h) Manufacturer. — one who products imports trades in and distributes salt.
(i) Subsistence producer manufacturer. — one who produces, trades in or distributes salt not exceeding two metric tons (2 m.t) of salt per year.
(j) Small producer/manufacturer. — one who produces, imports trades in, or distributes salt ranging from more than two metric tons (2 m.t.) to three hundred metric tons (300 m.t.) per year.
(k) Medium producer manufacturer. — one who products, imports, trades in, or distributes salt ranging from more than three hundred metric tons (300 m.t.) to two thousand metric tons (2,000 m.t.) per year.
(l) Large producer manufacturer. — one who produces, imports trades in, or distributes salt exceeding two thousand metric tons (2,000 m.t.) per year.
Sec. 5. Application. — (a) Thus Act shall apply to the entire salt industry, including salt producers/manufacturers, importers, traders, and distributors as well as government and non-government agencies involved in salt iodization activities.
chan robles virtual law library
(b) Iodized salt that conforms to the standards set by the BFAD to meet national nutritional needs shall be made available to consumers Provided, That the implementation of this Act shall be enforced over a staggered period of one (1) year for large and medium producers manufacturers, two (2) years for small producers/manufacturers; and five (5) years for subsistence producers/manufacturers.
(c) All food outlets, restaurants, and stores are hereby required to make available to customers only iodized salt in their establishment upon effectivity of this Act. These establishments shall be monitored with the help of the LGUs through its health officers and nutritionists/dietitians, or in their absence, the sanitary inspectors to check and monitor the quality of food-grade salt being sold or served in such establishments.chan robles virtual law library
(d) In areas endemic to iodine deficiency disorders, iodized salt shall be made available Local government officials at the provincial and municipal levels shall provide mechanisms to ensure enforcement of this provision through ordinances and public information campaigns.
(e) All food manufacturers processors using food-grade salt are also required to use iodized salt in the processing of their products and must comply with the provisions of this Act not later than one (1) year from its effectivity. Provided, That the use of iodized salt shall not prejudice the quality and safety of their food products: Provided, however, That the burden of proof and testing for any prejudicial effects due to iodized salt fortification lies on the said food manufacturers/processor.
(f) Salt producers/manufacturers shall register with the BFAD, which shall maintain updated registry of salt producers/manufacturers and shall monitor compliance with the salt iodization program.
(g) All food-grade salt shall be labeled in a manner that is true and accurate, not likely to mislead purchasers and in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the BFAD.
(h) For a period of three (3) years from the effectivity of this Act, the DOH shall provide free iodized salt to indigents residing in sixth class municipalities as may be allowed by their annual appropriations.
Sec. 6. Support to the Salt Industry. — The following agencies and institutions shall support the salt iodization program through their respective internal programs.
(a) the DTI is hereby required to assist and support local salt producers/manufacturers in upgrading their production technologies to include iodization by helping them obtain soft loans and financial assistance for the procurement of salt iodization machines, packaging equipment and technology and fortificant and by ensuring the systematic distribution of the iodized salt in the market.
chan robles virtual law library
(b) the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) shall assist the formation of cooperatives of local salt producers/manufacturers in order that they can economically engage in salt iodization and distribution of iodized salt:
(c) the DOST in collaboration with the TLRC, shall develop and implement comprehensive programs for the acquisition of design and manufacture of salt iodization machines and transfer of salt iodization technology to small and subsistence local salt producers/manufacturers; and
(d) the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and other appropriate government agencies shall identify areas that are suitable for use as salt farms with the purpose of protecting such areas from environmental risks to ensure sustainability of iodized salt production.
Sec. 7. Public Information. — The benefits and rationale of the use of iodized salt shall be adequately disseminated and promoted through organized, systematic and nationwide information campaign which shall involve major sectors of society to be spearheaded by the DOH, in cooperation and coordination with the LGUs and other agencies concerned, particularly the Department of Education, Culture and Sports (DECS), the Philippine Information Agency (PIA), provincial science centers, private sector, and students.
chan robles virtual law library
The implementing agency, in coordination with the PIA, shall seek the cooperation of the media sector to assist in public information dissemination. Salt iodization and its benefits shall also be included and given emphasis in all levels of health subjects in both public and private schools.
Sec. 8. The Salt Iodization Advisory Board. — The National Nutrition Council (NNC), as presently composed, including representatives of the DENR, the medical profession and the salt manufacturers shall serve as the salt iodization advisory board and shall function as the policy and coordinating body on salt iodization programs and activities. It shall coordinate the efforts of all agencies concerned and monitor the implementation of the provisions of this Act. It shall also submit an annual report to the Congress of the Philippines on the progress of the salt iodization program and offer recommendations for its improvements.chan robles virtual law library
Sec. 9. Sanctions. — The procedures for imposing sanctions under this Act and for inspecting and investigating the premises where any salt is received, held, manufactured, labeled, stored, displayed, delivered, distributed, sold, or located. or where it is reasonably believed these activities are being carried out or where salt is located, shall be in accordance with the provisions of Republic Act No. 3720, otherwise known as the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended: Provided, That any person, whether natural or juridical, who violates any of the provisions of this Act or any of the rules and regulations promulgated for its effective implementation shall be punished by a fine of not less than One thousand pesos (P1,000) nor more than One hundred thousand pesos (P100,000): Provided, however, That if the violation is committed by any officer, director or member of a business and a juridical entity acting beyond the scope of his authority, such officer, director or member responsible therefor shall be personally liable for the fine: Provided, further, That such violator shall suffer a revocation of its business permit and/or a ban of its product from the market: Provided, finally, That the BFAD, in coordination with the LGUs concerned, shall be authorized to impose and collect the fines from the violators, and such collections shall accrue to the BFAD for its use in the implementation if this Act.
Sec. 10. Appropriations. — The amount necessary for the implementation of this Act shall initially be charged to the appropriations of the agencies concerned as may be appropriated, under the current General Appropriations Act. Thereafter, such amount as may be necessary for its implementation shall be included in the annual General Appropriations Act.
Sec. 11. Implementing Rules and Regulations. — The DOH in cooperation with the agencies concerned shall formulate the necessary rules and regulations for the effective implementation of this Act within sixty (60) days from its approval.
Sec. 12. Separability Clause. — If any portion of this Act is declared invalid, the remainder of this Act shall not be affected by such declaration and shall remain valid and enforceable.chan robles virtual law library
Sec. 13. Effectivity Clause. — This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in the Official Gazette or in two (2) national newspaper of general circulation, whichever is earlier.
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:51 am
FROM URL: http://www.wonder-cures.com/art3.htm
Warning Against Dangers of
Iodized Salt
To:
The Chief Justice,
Supreme Court,
New Delhi.
Respected Sir,
The Government of India and State Governments have no constitutional right to make any law to force me or anyone else to consume iodized salt. I want to retain the option of not using iodized salt when I do not require it. No law in the world can force me to use it. Only those persons should use iodized salt for whose health it is suitable or beneficial.
Any compulsion regarding the use of iodized salt is illegal and unconstitutional. There are many people like me who are against compulsion regarding the use of iodized salt. Regular use of iodized salt is not suitable for most people living in countries or regions with a hot tropical climate as is the case in most parts of India.
I know of many people using iodized salt who have become very seriously sick. I have personally met a number of people in Pune and Bombay who had been using iodized salt in their food and had lost immunity to various diseases and particularly to those associated with diarrhea. Most of them got cured after they listened to my advice and stopped taking iodized salt.
Iodized salt manufactured in India is deliberately made to contain a dangerously high amount of iodine to compensate for the loss of iodine that results from its long storage. This is a foolish, short-sighted and criminal policy. Some people who are unlucky in using the freshly manufactured iodized salt suffer tremendously due to the excessive ingestion of iodine.
Excessive consumption of iodine can cause or aggravate the following conditions:
1. Hyperthyroidism (which produces excess heat in the body).
2. Diarrhea, dysentery, gastro-enteritis, cholera.
3. Rapid loss in weight.
4. Respiratory distress.
5. Gout.
6. Diabetes.
7. Kidney stones.
8. Skin cancer.
9. Severe pain in various parts of the body.
10. Susceptibility to AIDS.
The excessive consumption of iodine through the use of iodized salt is one of the main causes of AIDS. This can be proved scientifically. AIDS is more prevalent in western countries where people regularly use iodized salt. So we should not blindly ape the West where AIDS and other dangerous diseases are spreading rapidly.
The incidence of AIDS has rapidly increased in India after the consumption of iodized salt started on a large scale. Compulsory use of iodized salt would lead to a havoc of enormous proportions. It would be a thousand times worse that the Bhopal Gas Tragedy. A poor country like India cannot afford to have the scourge of AIDS.
Only in the areas where goiter is widespread should the use of iodized salt be made a regular habit. The lives of crores of people should not be endangered for the sake of a few. The whims and fancies of a handful of misguided politicians and pseudo-scientists should be curbed. The Government has no right to play with the lives of crores of poor innocent people who are not even aware of the extreme danger they are exposed to.
I request the Honorable Supreme Court to prevent the Union and State Governments from taking any hasty steps in making the consumption of iodized salt compulsory. I earnestly hope that you would safeguard my legitimate interests and also the constitutional rights of all the people of India against the arbitrary and blatant interference by the Government in determining the food habits of the masses.
Yours sincerely,
Ashok Jaisinghani.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter, dated 29 March 1990, addressed to
The Chief Justice, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi,
with copies sent to:
The then President of India, R. Venkataraman.
Health Minister, Government of India.
Health Ministers of Indian State Governments.
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Members of the Indian Parliament (at that time): Atal Behari Vajpayee, L. K. Advani, Ram Jethmalani, Subramaniam Swamy.
Editors of important Indian newspapers and magazines.
And others. [b]
Warning Against Dangers of
Iodized Salt
To:
The Chief Justice,
Supreme Court,
New Delhi.
Respected Sir,
The Government of India and State Governments have no constitutional right to make any law to force me or anyone else to consume iodized salt. I want to retain the option of not using iodized salt when I do not require it. No law in the world can force me to use it. Only those persons should use iodized salt for whose health it is suitable or beneficial.
Any compulsion regarding the use of iodized salt is illegal and unconstitutional. There are many people like me who are against compulsion regarding the use of iodized salt. Regular use of iodized salt is not suitable for most people living in countries or regions with a hot tropical climate as is the case in most parts of India.
I know of many people using iodized salt who have become very seriously sick. I have personally met a number of people in Pune and Bombay who had been using iodized salt in their food and had lost immunity to various diseases and particularly to those associated with diarrhea. Most of them got cured after they listened to my advice and stopped taking iodized salt.
Iodized salt manufactured in India is deliberately made to contain a dangerously high amount of iodine to compensate for the loss of iodine that results from its long storage. This is a foolish, short-sighted and criminal policy. Some people who are unlucky in using the freshly manufactured iodized salt suffer tremendously due to the excessive ingestion of iodine.
Excessive consumption of iodine can cause or aggravate the following conditions:
1. Hyperthyroidism (which produces excess heat in the body).
2. Diarrhea, dysentery, gastro-enteritis, cholera.
3. Rapid loss in weight.
4. Respiratory distress.
5. Gout.
6. Diabetes.
7. Kidney stones.
8. Skin cancer.
9. Severe pain in various parts of the body.
10. Susceptibility to AIDS.
The excessive consumption of iodine through the use of iodized salt is one of the main causes of AIDS. This can be proved scientifically. AIDS is more prevalent in western countries where people regularly use iodized salt. So we should not blindly ape the West where AIDS and other dangerous diseases are spreading rapidly.
The incidence of AIDS has rapidly increased in India after the consumption of iodized salt started on a large scale. Compulsory use of iodized salt would lead to a havoc of enormous proportions. It would be a thousand times worse that the Bhopal Gas Tragedy. A poor country like India cannot afford to have the scourge of AIDS.
Only in the areas where goiter is widespread should the use of iodized salt be made a regular habit. The lives of crores of people should not be endangered for the sake of a few. The whims and fancies of a handful of misguided politicians and pseudo-scientists should be curbed. The Government has no right to play with the lives of crores of poor innocent people who are not even aware of the extreme danger they are exposed to.
I request the Honorable Supreme Court to prevent the Union and State Governments from taking any hasty steps in making the consumption of iodized salt compulsory. I earnestly hope that you would safeguard my legitimate interests and also the constitutional rights of all the people of India against the arbitrary and blatant interference by the Government in determining the food habits of the masses.
Yours sincerely,
Ashok Jaisinghani.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter, dated 29 March 1990, addressed to
The Chief Justice, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi,
with copies sent to:
The then President of India, R. Venkataraman.
Health Minister, Government of India.
Health Ministers of Indian State Governments.
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Members of the Indian Parliament (at that time): Atal Behari Vajpayee, L. K. Advani, Ram Jethmalani, Subramaniam Swamy.
Editors of important Indian newspapers and magazines.
And others. [b]
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:52 am
Aspartame Killed My Wife - One Mans Story. This video won an Austin Access TV award for best interview. Produced by Mike Hanson. Digg This Video.
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:53 am
OBAMA PICKS A BILDERBERGER AS HIS HEALTH SECRETARY
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:57 am
Aspartame & Aspartame Poisoning
Aspartame, the artificial sweetener used to make Nutrasweet / Equal and sometimes labeled as phenylalanine in products, has been the subject of heated controversy—both because of safety issues and the shady circumstances surrounding its approval. Considering possible connections between aspartame and diseases such as brain tumors, brain lesions and lymphoma, and taking into account alleged conflicts of interest during the approval process, you owe it to yourself to learn the facts—not just what the lobbyists and manufacturer want you to know. As a primer before entering the site, check out the followig videos and links:
Aspartame & Rumsfeld | Aspartame On FOX New | Dr. Blaylock On Aspartame | Aspartame, Cancer & Kids | Aspartame On Wikipedia
DORway's Mission — Anti Aspartame Activism
DORway was David Oliver Riet'z WAY of repaying the Internet for providing the small, hard-to-find aspartame article he nearly missed, but that he credited with extending his life. That article was the 1996 FDA list of 92 symptoms of aspartame poisoning.
This site contains 800 plus Web pages of documentation showing that aspartame is neither a decent diet aid, nor was it ever proven to be safe for human consumption. Aspartame must be removed from our diet, but only you, the consumer, can effect its removal. In creating DORway, Dave's primary concern lay with the 250,000,000 unknowing victims (Monsanto's own figure) — all of whom are in some (guaranteed) stage of "aspartame disease," and who, as he once did, may desperately NEED this information. But even with more than four million visitors (as of Nov. 23, 2003), DORway has reached but a small percentage of these folks. Please pass this FREE health-restoring and perhaps life-saving information to everyone you care about.
Aspartame Poisoning — The Cure Is FREE
The "cure" for those with "aspartame poisoning" is absolutely FREE. There can be nothing "controversial" about eliminating something from one's diet and waking up feeling better.
Could You Have Aspartame Poisoning? Take the 60-Day Challenge
Try the FREE at-home 60-day NO-aspartame self-test and simply observe the results. All we ask is that each and every visitor tell at least two others about DORway and about the dangers of Aspartame.
Aspartame Poisoning - NOT an Internet Hoax
DORway.com opened Searle's "Pandora's" book of facts on aspartame during September of 1996. For over four years after Monsanto (who bought Searle in 1985) and their many PR and law firms all visited DORway.com many thousands of times (documented by IP addresses). The FDA, CDC and other entities visited, as well. The highly litigious Monsanto was unable to find anything to use against the site in an effort to close it down and relieve the growing pressures on its dying aspartame cash cow. Obviously, they cannot argue with the documentation (the most damning of which comes from the FDA and sworn testimony).
While two anti-aspartame Web sites (1996) grew to tens of thousands (as of October, 2001, Google.com had over 80,000), and while Nutrasweet's 28 million pounds of aspartame sold during 1996 slipped to only 20 million pounds during 1998, Monsanto sought to counter the truth (and their negative "good growth") with pro-aspartame WEB sites. When the "Nancy Markle" Email appeared during December, 1998, Monsanto and friends panicked. Monsanto, FDA, ADA, IFIC, MSFacts, TIME, CNN, LA Times, and a lot more who stood to LOSE if aspartame were recalled, ALL JOINED HANDS to call our information and the facts an "Internet hoax." Want a hint at the whole truth? Simply compare their messages, and then look for the $$$ connection. And the FDA? Just think future industry jobs and the fact that they are culpable of approving this cumulative toxic poison.
During mid February, 1999, while the many PRO aspartame articles seemed to be failing to turn the tide, Monsanto seemed to have made a momentous decision and stopped visiting DORway until after July. In April, they sold their Phenylalanine facilities (half of aspartame) to Great Lakes Chemical (GLC) for 125 million dollars. (A year later, GLC sued Monsanto for the 71 MILLION dollar shortfall in expected sales.) On the first of July, 1999, Monsanto put the Nutrasweet Co. on the auction block with TWO other companies - THREE of which had "combined sales of a billion dollars." So much for "good growth". It took another 10 months for Monsanto to find an investment firm that would relieve them of their growing burden.
Note: Dr. Friedman, who quit the FDA when Jane Henney was selected to become the permanent FDA commissioner (1999), elected to sign on with G. D. Searle as a senior vice president at a purported cushy $500,000 a year. He went to work for someone he was supposed to regulate. Could this new job be his reward for ignoring citizen complaints and defending aspartame and rbGH? Perhaps more importantly, does the U.S. have a congress that cares? Is there a justice department really interested in prosecuting fraud and genocide for huge profits? So far, the answers have all been NO!
DORway consists of hundreds of pages. Most TEXT files on this site can be obtained from the archives. For a good overview and commented links please download a copy of aspertame help.txt
- David O. Rietz, original founder and webmaster of DORway
Dave Wants His DISCOVERY to Help All Aspartame Users!
Aspartame is NOT a natural substance!
Aspartame is NOT a diet enhancement product!
Aspartame is NOT safe - for ANYONE!
Aspartame is NOT a food "additive"
Aspartame is an UNREGULATED and UNSAFE DRUG! (It was originally slated to be a peptic ulcer drug!)
Aspartame in liquids turns to FORMALDEHYDE above freezing!
Aspartame is even worse for DIABETICS!
Aspartame poisoning is cumulative (it adds up!)
Aspartame byproducts get stored in your FAT!
Aspartame has 92 "official" side effects (the worst is DEATH!)
Aspartame MIMICS a wide range of problems
Aspartame side effects are USUALLY MISDIAGNOSED! (By 21 doctors, in my case!)
Aspartame is unfit for human consumption!
Aspartame's approval by the FDA is A SHAMELESS tragedy!
Aspartame's approval for use in EVERYTHING is far worse!
Who are the culprits? FDA, Searle, Monsanto, NutraSweet and more!
The ONLY "CURE" is total exclusion from the diet!
TOTAL recovery may not be possible!
Only an irate and active PUBLIC can rid the world of this POISON!
If YOU have been affected... REPORT IT! GET INVOLVED!
DORway Disclaimer—Important!
DORway to Discovery is an INFORMATION site only. It is NOT a source of medical advice. Any and all suggestions stem from personal experiences (of any of the thousands of cases available). This information is presented FREE of all charge. It is yours to use as you deem reasonable and fitting. Any and all information you feel is important should be presented to your TRUSTED medical practitioner for evaluation and incorporation into YOUR personal situation.
Aspartame, the artificial sweetener used to make Nutrasweet / Equal and sometimes labeled as phenylalanine in products, has been the subject of heated controversy—both because of safety issues and the shady circumstances surrounding its approval. Considering possible connections between aspartame and diseases such as brain tumors, brain lesions and lymphoma, and taking into account alleged conflicts of interest during the approval process, you owe it to yourself to learn the facts—not just what the lobbyists and manufacturer want you to know. As a primer before entering the site, check out the followig videos and links:
Aspartame & Rumsfeld | Aspartame On FOX New | Dr. Blaylock On Aspartame | Aspartame, Cancer & Kids | Aspartame On Wikipedia
DORway's Mission — Anti Aspartame Activism
DORway was David Oliver Riet'z WAY of repaying the Internet for providing the small, hard-to-find aspartame article he nearly missed, but that he credited with extending his life. That article was the 1996 FDA list of 92 symptoms of aspartame poisoning.
This site contains 800 plus Web pages of documentation showing that aspartame is neither a decent diet aid, nor was it ever proven to be safe for human consumption. Aspartame must be removed from our diet, but only you, the consumer, can effect its removal. In creating DORway, Dave's primary concern lay with the 250,000,000 unknowing victims (Monsanto's own figure) — all of whom are in some (guaranteed) stage of "aspartame disease," and who, as he once did, may desperately NEED this information. But even with more than four million visitors (as of Nov. 23, 2003), DORway has reached but a small percentage of these folks. Please pass this FREE health-restoring and perhaps life-saving information to everyone you care about.
Aspartame Poisoning — The Cure Is FREE
The "cure" for those with "aspartame poisoning" is absolutely FREE. There can be nothing "controversial" about eliminating something from one's diet and waking up feeling better.
Could You Have Aspartame Poisoning? Take the 60-Day Challenge
Try the FREE at-home 60-day NO-aspartame self-test and simply observe the results. All we ask is that each and every visitor tell at least two others about DORway and about the dangers of Aspartame.
Aspartame Poisoning - NOT an Internet Hoax
DORway.com opened Searle's "Pandora's" book of facts on aspartame during September of 1996. For over four years after Monsanto (who bought Searle in 1985) and their many PR and law firms all visited DORway.com many thousands of times (documented by IP addresses). The FDA, CDC and other entities visited, as well. The highly litigious Monsanto was unable to find anything to use against the site in an effort to close it down and relieve the growing pressures on its dying aspartame cash cow. Obviously, they cannot argue with the documentation (the most damning of which comes from the FDA and sworn testimony).
While two anti-aspartame Web sites (1996) grew to tens of thousands (as of October, 2001, Google.com had over 80,000), and while Nutrasweet's 28 million pounds of aspartame sold during 1996 slipped to only 20 million pounds during 1998, Monsanto sought to counter the truth (and their negative "good growth") with pro-aspartame WEB sites. When the "Nancy Markle" Email appeared during December, 1998, Monsanto and friends panicked. Monsanto, FDA, ADA, IFIC, MSFacts, TIME, CNN, LA Times, and a lot more who stood to LOSE if aspartame were recalled, ALL JOINED HANDS to call our information and the facts an "Internet hoax." Want a hint at the whole truth? Simply compare their messages, and then look for the $$$ connection. And the FDA? Just think future industry jobs and the fact that they are culpable of approving this cumulative toxic poison.
During mid February, 1999, while the many PRO aspartame articles seemed to be failing to turn the tide, Monsanto seemed to have made a momentous decision and stopped visiting DORway until after July. In April, they sold their Phenylalanine facilities (half of aspartame) to Great Lakes Chemical (GLC) for 125 million dollars. (A year later, GLC sued Monsanto for the 71 MILLION dollar shortfall in expected sales.) On the first of July, 1999, Monsanto put the Nutrasweet Co. on the auction block with TWO other companies - THREE of which had "combined sales of a billion dollars." So much for "good growth". It took another 10 months for Monsanto to find an investment firm that would relieve them of their growing burden.
Note: Dr. Friedman, who quit the FDA when Jane Henney was selected to become the permanent FDA commissioner (1999), elected to sign on with G. D. Searle as a senior vice president at a purported cushy $500,000 a year. He went to work for someone he was supposed to regulate. Could this new job be his reward for ignoring citizen complaints and defending aspartame and rbGH? Perhaps more importantly, does the U.S. have a congress that cares? Is there a justice department really interested in prosecuting fraud and genocide for huge profits? So far, the answers have all been NO!
DORway consists of hundreds of pages. Most TEXT files on this site can be obtained from the archives. For a good overview and commented links please download a copy of aspertame help.txt
- David O. Rietz, original founder and webmaster of DORway
Dave Wants His DISCOVERY to Help All Aspartame Users!
Aspartame is NOT a natural substance!
Aspartame is NOT a diet enhancement product!
Aspartame is NOT safe - for ANYONE!
Aspartame is NOT a food "additive"
Aspartame is an UNREGULATED and UNSAFE DRUG! (It was originally slated to be a peptic ulcer drug!)
Aspartame in liquids turns to FORMALDEHYDE above freezing!
Aspartame is even worse for DIABETICS!
Aspartame poisoning is cumulative (it adds up!)
Aspartame byproducts get stored in your FAT!
Aspartame has 92 "official" side effects (the worst is DEATH!)
Aspartame MIMICS a wide range of problems
Aspartame side effects are USUALLY MISDIAGNOSED! (By 21 doctors, in my case!)
Aspartame is unfit for human consumption!
Aspartame's approval by the FDA is A SHAMELESS tragedy!
Aspartame's approval for use in EVERYTHING is far worse!
Who are the culprits? FDA, Searle, Monsanto, NutraSweet and more!
The ONLY "CURE" is total exclusion from the diet!
TOTAL recovery may not be possible!
Only an irate and active PUBLIC can rid the world of this POISON!
If YOU have been affected... REPORT IT! GET INVOLVED!
DORway Disclaimer—Important!
DORway to Discovery is an INFORMATION site only. It is NOT a source of medical advice. Any and all suggestions stem from personal experiences (of any of the thousands of cases available). This information is presented FREE of all charge. It is yours to use as you deem reasonable and fitting. Any and all information you feel is important should be presented to your TRUSTED medical practitioner for evaluation and incorporation into YOUR personal situation.
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:00 am
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Ray Mart Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:02 am
[
sOURCE: http://todayyesterdayandtomorrow.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/donald-rumsfeld-in-bed-with-aspartame/
ASPARTAME was initially discovered back in 1965 as a drug to treat peptic ulcers.
In it’s first 16 years of existence, the FDA absolutely positively refused it’s approval. It is dangerous and deadly. The Food and Drug Administration did it’s job, protecting the public. It refused to put Aspartame on the market.
For those initial 16 (Sixteen) Years.
However G.D. Searle Company, the chemical company that patented aspartame, continued to spend millions of dollars in their effort to bring it to market, conducting ’safety tests’ and submitting to the FDA over a hundred ’studies’ claiming aspartame was ’safe’.
The safety of aspartame was historically in question; an investigation into Searle’s testing procedures then also came into question. During the investigation into Searle’s testing procedures, it was discovered that much of the data was inaccurate, manipulated, and just downright shoddy. In the investigators report it was devulged “had never seen anything as bad as Searle’s testing”.
What then followed was a first in the history of the FDA. The FDA requested a criminal investigation of a manufacturer; for knowingly misrepresenting data, concealing material facts and making false statements in aspartame tests. The U.S. Attorney’s office was requested of the FDA to begin grand jury proceedings to investigate whether indictments should be filed against Searle… some 30 years ago, in 1977.
The U.S. Attorney in charge of the Investigation was Samuel Skinner.
Sidley & Austin was the law firm representing Searle.
Sidley & Austin negotiated a job deal with Samuel Skinner and in July 1977, Mr. Samuel Skinner left his U.S. Attorney’s job and joined the Sidley & Austin law firm working for Searle. His resignation stalled the grand jury investigation long enough for the statue of limitations on the aspartame charges to expire.
The grand jury investigation was discontinued.
The Public Board of Inquiry, FDA Scientists and Investigators, The National Soft Drink Association (NSDA) and many, many others made their objections of any aspartame approval cleary known. Searle needed to try another maneuver, a political one, to get the approval they so wanted.
Enter:
Donald Rumsfeld
G. D. Searle hired Donald Rumsfeld in March 1977 as their CEO in this political effort. A former Member of Congress and Secretary of Defense in the Ford Administration, Rumsfeld soon hired several of his Washington cronies as top management.
The Aspartame ball began to roll.
Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, stated in a January 1981 sales meeting that he would push for aspartames‘ approval using his political clout in Washington, rather than proper scientific means, to ensure aspartame’s approval.
When Ronald Reagan was sworn in as President of the United States, Reagan’s transition team, which included Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, hand picked Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes Jr. to be the new FDA Commissioner in January 1981.
Donald Rumsfeld In Bed With Aspartame
August 10, 2007 in Aspartame, Aspartate, Avoid-Aspartame, Beverages, Cancer, Canderel, Donald Rumsfeld, Eating Can Kill You, Equal, Ethanol, FDA, Food, Genetically Engineered, Genetically Modified, Graves Disease, Health, Hyperthyroid, Lawsuit, Methanol, Monsanto, News, NutraSweet, Phenylalanine, Politics, Science, Sweet Misery, Transgenic, Video | Tags: Aspertame, CFS, Chronic Fatigue, Donald Rumsfeld, Donald Rumsfield, Fibromyalgia, FM, FMS, Genetically Modified food, GMO
Ads by Google
"25 Pounds in 2 Weeks"
Amazing New Weight-Loss Discovery. As Seen on CNN - Try It Here!
www.25-Pounds-in-2-Weeks.com
Aspartame was initially discovered back in 1965 as a drug to treat peptic ulcers.
In it’s first 16 years of existence, the FDA absolutely positively refused it’s approval. It is dangerous and deadly. The Food and Drug Administration did it’s job, protecting the public. It refused to put Aspartame on the market.
For those initial 16 (Sixteen) Years.
However G.D. Searle Company, the chemical company that patented aspartame, continued to spend millions of dollars in their effort to bring it to market, conducting ’safety tests’ and submitting to the FDA over a hundred ’studies’ claiming aspartame was ’safe’.
The safety of aspartame was historically in question; an investigation into Searle’s testing procedures then also came into question. During the investigation into Searle’s testing procedures, it was discovered that much of the data was inaccurate, manipulated, and just downright shoddy. In the investigators report it was devulged “had never seen anything as bad as Searle’s testing”.
What then followed was a first in the history of the FDA. The FDA requested a criminal investigation of a manufacturer; for knowingly misrepresenting data, concealing material facts and making false statements in aspartame tests. The U.S. Attorney’s office was requested of the FDA to begin grand jury proceedings to investigate whether indictments should be filed against Searle… some 30 years ago, in 1977.
The U.S. Attorney in charge of the Investigation was Samuel Skinner.
Sidley & Austin was the law firm representing Searle.
Sidley & Austin negotiated a job deal with Samuel Skinner and in July 1977, Mr. Samuel Skinner left his U.S. Attorney’s job and joined the Sidley & Austin law firm working for Searle. His resignation stalled the grand jury investigation long enough for the statue of limitations on the aspartame charges to expire.
The grand jury investigation was discontinued.
The Public Board of Inquiry, FDA Scientists and Investigators, The National Soft Drink Association (NSDA) and many, many others made their objections of any aspartame approval cleary known. Searle needed to try another maneuver, a political one, to get the approval they so wanted.
Enter:
Donald Rumsfeld
G. D. Searle hired Donald Rumsfeld in March 1977 as their CEO in this political effort. A former Member of Congress and Secretary of Defense in the Ford Administration, Rumsfeld soon hired several of his Washington cronies as top management.
The Aspartame ball began to roll.
Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, stated in a January 1981 sales meeting that he would push for aspartames‘ approval using his political clout in Washington, rather than proper scientific means, to ensure aspartame’s approval.
When Ronald Reagan was sworn in as President of the United States, Reagan’s transition team, which included Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, hand picked Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes Jr. to be the new FDA Commissioner in January 1981.
Dr. Arthur Hayes, Jr. (above center), ignoring the warnings and recommendations of his own internal FDA team, his own FDA scientists, overruled the Public Board of Inquiry.
In one of his first official acts as the new FDA Commissioner, Arthur Hayes, Jr. approved NutraSweet (Aspartame) for dry products.
Dr. Hayes then resigned two years later in 1983 and took a job with Burson-Marsteller, Searle’s public relations firm, as a senior scientific consultant. Burson-Marsteller also happened to represent several of NutraSeet’s major users.
TIP: Go back up and click on that red link. There’s a few of those easter eggs in here. (ok.. a lot) *grins*
Donald Rumsfeld’s achievement at Searle brought him awards such as the Outstanding Chief Executive Officer in the Pharmaceutical Industry from the Wall Street Transcript (1980) and Financial World (1981).
On June 1, 1985, Donald Rumsfeld became the first person in the Searl’s history who was not a member of the Searle family to serve as chairman of the board.
In 1985, Monsanto purchased Searle.
Monsanto is a top maker of Genetic Engineering. Monsanto is making your food. Genetically Modified food is on 70% of the store shelves today, using tactics just like this for ‘approval’. There is no independent researching on any of these ingredients prior to your eating them. None.
SOURCE: http://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://todayyesterdayandtomorrow.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/monsantogrown1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://todayyesterdayandtomorrow.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/donald-rumsfeld-in-bed-with-aspartame/&usg=__P-YQz5m5gX7GwLmiD4pgEzLBzMU=&h=374&w=428&sz=30&hl=tl&start=28&sig2=6NVtmGAaveFik2Ppi7npMg&um=1&tbnid=BOZwWx_TA1lpNM:&tbnh=110&tbnw=126&ei=YSmxSf_1DJGa6gPB-NGFAw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Daspartame%2Bproducts%26ndsp%3D20%26hl%3Dtl%26sa%3DN%26start%3D20%26um%3D1
Below is some clinical data that has been attributed to Aspartame products.
Thank Donald Rumsfeld for being in bed with the patent holder of aspartame G.D. Searle, should you run into him and you or loved ones have any of these issues and have been trusting Aspartame:
Eye:
Decreased vision and/or other eye problems
Pain (one or both eyes)
Decreased tears, trouble with contact lens, or both
Blindness (one or both eyes)
Ear:
Tinnitus (“ringing,” “buzzing”)
Severe intolerance for noise
Marked impairment of hearing
Neuralgic:
Headaches
Dizziness, unsteadiness, or both
Confusion, memory loss, or both
Severe drowsiness and sleepiness
Paresthesias (“pins and needles,” “tingling”) or numbness of limbs
Convulsions (grand mal epileptic attacks)
Petit mal attacks and “absences”
Non classified seizures
Severe slurring of speech
Severe tremors
Severe “hyperactivity” and “restless legs”
Atypical facial pain
Simulation of multiple sclerosis
Psychological/Psychiatric:
Severe depression
Suicidal ideas/attempts
Extreme irritability
Severe anxiety attacks
Marked personality changes
Recent “severe insomnia
Severe aggravation of phobias
Addiction to aspartame
Chest/Heart:
Palpitations, tachicardia
(rapid heart action) or both
Shortness of breath
Atypical chest pain
Recent hypertension
(high blood pressure)
Gastrointestinal:
Nausea
Diarrhea
Associated gross blood in stools
Abdominal pain
Pain on swallowing
Skin/Allergies:
Severe itching without rash
Severe lip and mouth reactions
Uticaria (hives)
Severe genital itching, rash, or both
Lupus erythematosus-type eruption
Other rashes
Marked thinning or loss of hair
Aggravation of respiratory allergies
Dual sensitivity to MSG
Weight Disorders:
Paradoxic marked weight gain
Marked weight loss
Rheumatologic/Muscular:
Severe joint pains
Fibromyalgia
Leg and hand cramps
Myasthenia gravis
Endocrine/Metabolic:
Problems with diabetes (loss of control;
precipitation of clinical diabetes;
aggravation or simulation of diabetic complications)
Aggravated hypoglycemia (“low blood sugar attacks”)
Menstrual changes:
Severe reduction or cessation of periods
Hyperthyroidism
Graves disease
Fluid/Urinary Disturbances:
Frequency of voiding (day and night), burning on
Urination (dysuria), or both
Intense thirst
Bloat
Fluid retention and swelling (feet and legs)
Kidney stones[color]
sOURCE: http://todayyesterdayandtomorrow.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/donald-rumsfeld-in-bed-with-aspartame/
ASPARTAME was initially discovered back in 1965 as a drug to treat peptic ulcers.
In it’s first 16 years of existence, the FDA absolutely positively refused it’s approval. It is dangerous and deadly. The Food and Drug Administration did it’s job, protecting the public. It refused to put Aspartame on the market.
For those initial 16 (Sixteen) Years.
However G.D. Searle Company, the chemical company that patented aspartame, continued to spend millions of dollars in their effort to bring it to market, conducting ’safety tests’ and submitting to the FDA over a hundred ’studies’ claiming aspartame was ’safe’.
The safety of aspartame was historically in question; an investigation into Searle’s testing procedures then also came into question. During the investigation into Searle’s testing procedures, it was discovered that much of the data was inaccurate, manipulated, and just downright shoddy. In the investigators report it was devulged “had never seen anything as bad as Searle’s testing”.
What then followed was a first in the history of the FDA. The FDA requested a criminal investigation of a manufacturer; for knowingly misrepresenting data, concealing material facts and making false statements in aspartame tests. The U.S. Attorney’s office was requested of the FDA to begin grand jury proceedings to investigate whether indictments should be filed against Searle… some 30 years ago, in 1977.
The U.S. Attorney in charge of the Investigation was Samuel Skinner.
Sidley & Austin was the law firm representing Searle.
Sidley & Austin negotiated a job deal with Samuel Skinner and in July 1977, Mr. Samuel Skinner left his U.S. Attorney’s job and joined the Sidley & Austin law firm working for Searle. His resignation stalled the grand jury investigation long enough for the statue of limitations on the aspartame charges to expire.
The grand jury investigation was discontinued.
The Public Board of Inquiry, FDA Scientists and Investigators, The National Soft Drink Association (NSDA) and many, many others made their objections of any aspartame approval cleary known. Searle needed to try another maneuver, a political one, to get the approval they so wanted.
Enter:
Donald Rumsfeld
G. D. Searle hired Donald Rumsfeld in March 1977 as their CEO in this political effort. A former Member of Congress and Secretary of Defense in the Ford Administration, Rumsfeld soon hired several of his Washington cronies as top management.
The Aspartame ball began to roll.
Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, stated in a January 1981 sales meeting that he would push for aspartames‘ approval using his political clout in Washington, rather than proper scientific means, to ensure aspartame’s approval.
When Ronald Reagan was sworn in as President of the United States, Reagan’s transition team, which included Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, hand picked Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes Jr. to be the new FDA Commissioner in January 1981.
Donald Rumsfeld In Bed With Aspartame
August 10, 2007 in Aspartame, Aspartate, Avoid-Aspartame, Beverages, Cancer, Canderel, Donald Rumsfeld, Eating Can Kill You, Equal, Ethanol, FDA, Food, Genetically Engineered, Genetically Modified, Graves Disease, Health, Hyperthyroid, Lawsuit, Methanol, Monsanto, News, NutraSweet, Phenylalanine, Politics, Science, Sweet Misery, Transgenic, Video | Tags: Aspertame, CFS, Chronic Fatigue, Donald Rumsfeld, Donald Rumsfield, Fibromyalgia, FM, FMS, Genetically Modified food, GMO
Ads by Google
"25 Pounds in 2 Weeks"
Amazing New Weight-Loss Discovery. As Seen on CNN - Try It Here!
www.25-Pounds-in-2-Weeks.com
Aspartame was initially discovered back in 1965 as a drug to treat peptic ulcers.
In it’s first 16 years of existence, the FDA absolutely positively refused it’s approval. It is dangerous and deadly. The Food and Drug Administration did it’s job, protecting the public. It refused to put Aspartame on the market.
For those initial 16 (Sixteen) Years.
However G.D. Searle Company, the chemical company that patented aspartame, continued to spend millions of dollars in their effort to bring it to market, conducting ’safety tests’ and submitting to the FDA over a hundred ’studies’ claiming aspartame was ’safe’.
The safety of aspartame was historically in question; an investigation into Searle’s testing procedures then also came into question. During the investigation into Searle’s testing procedures, it was discovered that much of the data was inaccurate, manipulated, and just downright shoddy. In the investigators report it was devulged “had never seen anything as bad as Searle’s testing”.
What then followed was a first in the history of the FDA. The FDA requested a criminal investigation of a manufacturer; for knowingly misrepresenting data, concealing material facts and making false statements in aspartame tests. The U.S. Attorney’s office was requested of the FDA to begin grand jury proceedings to investigate whether indictments should be filed against Searle… some 30 years ago, in 1977.
The U.S. Attorney in charge of the Investigation was Samuel Skinner.
Sidley & Austin was the law firm representing Searle.
Sidley & Austin negotiated a job deal with Samuel Skinner and in July 1977, Mr. Samuel Skinner left his U.S. Attorney’s job and joined the Sidley & Austin law firm working for Searle. His resignation stalled the grand jury investigation long enough for the statue of limitations on the aspartame charges to expire.
The grand jury investigation was discontinued.
The Public Board of Inquiry, FDA Scientists and Investigators, The National Soft Drink Association (NSDA) and many, many others made their objections of any aspartame approval cleary known. Searle needed to try another maneuver, a political one, to get the approval they so wanted.
Enter:
Donald Rumsfeld
G. D. Searle hired Donald Rumsfeld in March 1977 as their CEO in this political effort. A former Member of Congress and Secretary of Defense in the Ford Administration, Rumsfeld soon hired several of his Washington cronies as top management.
The Aspartame ball began to roll.
Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, stated in a January 1981 sales meeting that he would push for aspartames‘ approval using his political clout in Washington, rather than proper scientific means, to ensure aspartame’s approval.
When Ronald Reagan was sworn in as President of the United States, Reagan’s transition team, which included Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, hand picked Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes Jr. to be the new FDA Commissioner in January 1981.
Dr. Arthur Hayes, Jr. (above center), ignoring the warnings and recommendations of his own internal FDA team, his own FDA scientists, overruled the Public Board of Inquiry.
In one of his first official acts as the new FDA Commissioner, Arthur Hayes, Jr. approved NutraSweet (Aspartame) for dry products.
Dr. Hayes then resigned two years later in 1983 and took a job with Burson-Marsteller, Searle’s public relations firm, as a senior scientific consultant. Burson-Marsteller also happened to represent several of NutraSeet’s major users.
TIP: Go back up and click on that red link. There’s a few of those easter eggs in here. (ok.. a lot) *grins*
Donald Rumsfeld’s achievement at Searle brought him awards such as the Outstanding Chief Executive Officer in the Pharmaceutical Industry from the Wall Street Transcript (1980) and Financial World (1981).
On June 1, 1985, Donald Rumsfeld became the first person in the Searl’s history who was not a member of the Searle family to serve as chairman of the board.
In 1985, Monsanto purchased Searle.
Monsanto is a top maker of Genetic Engineering. Monsanto is making your food. Genetically Modified food is on 70% of the store shelves today, using tactics just like this for ‘approval’. There is no independent researching on any of these ingredients prior to your eating them. None.
SOURCE: http://images.google.com.ph/imgres?imgurl=http://todayyesterdayandtomorrow.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/monsantogrown1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://todayyesterdayandtomorrow.wordpress.com/2007/08/10/donald-rumsfeld-in-bed-with-aspartame/&usg=__P-YQz5m5gX7GwLmiD4pgEzLBzMU=&h=374&w=428&sz=30&hl=tl&start=28&sig2=6NVtmGAaveFik2Ppi7npMg&um=1&tbnid=BOZwWx_TA1lpNM:&tbnh=110&tbnw=126&ei=YSmxSf_1DJGa6gPB-NGFAw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Daspartame%2Bproducts%26ndsp%3D20%26hl%3Dtl%26sa%3DN%26start%3D20%26um%3D1
Below is some clinical data that has been attributed to Aspartame products.
Thank Donald Rumsfeld for being in bed with the patent holder of aspartame G.D. Searle, should you run into him and you or loved ones have any of these issues and have been trusting Aspartame:
Eye:
Decreased vision and/or other eye problems
Pain (one or both eyes)
Decreased tears, trouble with contact lens, or both
Blindness (one or both eyes)
Ear:
Tinnitus (“ringing,” “buzzing”)
Severe intolerance for noise
Marked impairment of hearing
Neuralgic:
Headaches
Dizziness, unsteadiness, or both
Confusion, memory loss, or both
Severe drowsiness and sleepiness
Paresthesias (“pins and needles,” “tingling”) or numbness of limbs
Convulsions (grand mal epileptic attacks)
Petit mal attacks and “absences”
Non classified seizures
Severe slurring of speech
Severe tremors
Severe “hyperactivity” and “restless legs”
Atypical facial pain
Simulation of multiple sclerosis
Psychological/Psychiatric:
Severe depression
Suicidal ideas/attempts
Extreme irritability
Severe anxiety attacks
Marked personality changes
Recent “severe insomnia
Severe aggravation of phobias
Addiction to aspartame
Chest/Heart:
Palpitations, tachicardia
(rapid heart action) or both
Shortness of breath
Atypical chest pain
Recent hypertension
(high blood pressure)
Gastrointestinal:
Nausea
Diarrhea
Associated gross blood in stools
Abdominal pain
Pain on swallowing
Skin/Allergies:
Severe itching without rash
Severe lip and mouth reactions
Uticaria (hives)
Severe genital itching, rash, or both
Lupus erythematosus-type eruption
Other rashes
Marked thinning or loss of hair
Aggravation of respiratory allergies
Dual sensitivity to MSG
Weight Disorders:
Paradoxic marked weight gain
Marked weight loss
Rheumatologic/Muscular:
Severe joint pains
Fibromyalgia
Leg and hand cramps
Myasthenia gravis
Endocrine/Metabolic:
Problems with diabetes (loss of control;
precipitation of clinical diabetes;
aggravation or simulation of diabetic complications)
Aggravated hypoglycemia (“low blood sugar attacks”)
Menstrual changes:
Severe reduction or cessation of periods
Hyperthyroidism
Graves disease
Fluid/Urinary Disturbances:
Frequency of voiding (day and night), burning on
Urination (dysuria), or both
Intense thirst
Bloat
Fluid retention and swelling (feet and legs)
Kidney stones[color]
Ray Mart- Posts : 367
Join date : 2009-03-17
Age : 34
Re: GLOBAL 2000 REPORT - U.N.'S 4TH HIDDEN AGENDA, THE DEPOPULATION AGENDA / AGENDA 21 THE EARTH CHARTER / SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Sponsored content
Sponsored content
Page 3 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Similar topics» One World Christ Agenda - U.N.'s GLOBAL TERRA 2000, or PROJECT BLUE BEAM by Serge Monast
» ONE WORLD CONSTITUTION - CONSTITION FOR THE FEDERATION OF EARTH (CFE) WILL REPLACE EVENTUALLY THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER
» THE ESOTERIC AGENDA THAT INCLUDES THE BIO-DIVERSITY PROGRAM OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT TO POSSESS ALL LANDS AND PROPERTIES IN PAYMENT OF NATIONAL DEBTS OF U.N. MEMBER NATIONS
» One World Government Agenda Expose - SECRET SOCIETIES
» GLOBAL WARMING
» ONE WORLD CONSTITUTION - CONSTITION FOR THE FEDERATION OF EARTH (CFE) WILL REPLACE EVENTUALLY THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER
» THE ESOTERIC AGENDA THAT INCLUDES THE BIO-DIVERSITY PROGRAM OF THE WORLD GOVERNMENT TO POSSESS ALL LANDS AND PROPERTIES IN PAYMENT OF NATIONAL DEBTS OF U.N. MEMBER NATIONS
» One World Government Agenda Expose - SECRET SOCIETIES
» GLOBAL WARMING
Page 3 of 7
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum